Video uploaded: ICSD9/11 Text:ICSC 9/11 Links and added videos: Nor Cal Truth April 2, 2011
New NIST FOIA NBC Restricted Cameraman footage of WTC 7 west face.
A Fox News hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement written by former Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro inadvertently reveals a shocking truth; that World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who collected nearly $500 million dollars in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story structure that was not hit by a plane but collapsed within seven seconds on September 11, was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.
Atlantic Records rap star Lupe Fiasco calls the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 into question on his new album ‘Lasers,’ released March 8, 2011.
In “Words I Never Said,” the new radio single off of ‘Lasers,’ he asks “9/11, building 7: did they really pull it?” (at 0:46)
It is one of three songs selected as “singles” by Atlantic to promote the album. Lupe’s third official release—and first in which he specifically questions the government’s version of events on 9/11/01 with reference to ignored evidence — is the Grammy Award winner’s first #1 album in the United States (all genres), with over 200,000 units sold in its opening week: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1660010/lupe-fiasco-lasers-billboard.jhtml
Posted by YouTube user ICSD911. FOIA NIST Release #29 42A0319 GD29 D1-D10 Images
This is exactly what we would expect to see after the buildings were taken apart with explosives, and does not look like the forensic evidence we would expect to see from three classical building collapses from weak fires. Notice the World Financial Center to the west is almost untouched, as well as the two buildings on either side of WTC 7. Remember these were two 1/4 mile high structures and a third 47 story super-engineered building.
The BuildingWhat? campaign is thrilled to announce that two weeks from now on Saturday March 26 we will be holding an event in West Hartford, CT to unveil our new TV spot and kick off a marathon six-month effort to create widespread awareness of the collapse of Building 7. With your support and the support of thousands of others, the TV spot will air in late April and be seen by millions of viewers in the New York Metropolitan Area, setting the stage for an even larger ad campaign during the week of the 10th Anniversary of 9/11.
Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time will run from 9:30am to 9:30pm on Saturday March 26 at the University of Hartford’s Millard Auditorium. This historic event will feature the most articulate voices in the growing movement to bring about a new 9/11 investigation. Experts who have studied the events of 9/11 extensively will introduce irrefutable evidence demonstrating the need for a new investigation, and they will be calling upon New York City elected officials and the media to reexamine the most important event of our time, starting with the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
In preparation for the 10th year anniversary of the 9/11 murders, the 9/11 Memorial has put up an online interactive 9/11 timeline. It hasn’t been up more than 24 hours.
I have not had much time to review it, but sure enough I noticed a major fault right away!
The timeline mentions the WTC# 7 “collapse” at 5:20pm and if you click on the images available for that time, you will see 3 pictures - one of them being the one shown below.
The 9/11 Memorial Interactive Timeline that was just put online says that this is a raging fire in WTC 7, however it looks a lot like WTC #5
Lets look at an undisputed picture and video of WTC# 5:
WTC# 5 After the Fires
Notice the vertical beams and arched windows in the pictures and video of WTC# 5?
Those types of beams and arches are NOT present in WTC# 7 by any means:
The 9/11 Memorial Timeline obviously is a joke for anyone interested in truth. There were no massive fires at WTC#7 and the fires that were alive were not enough to bring any building down in the manner that WTC#7 came down; it was a controlled demolition!
Worse than a joke, this memorial is peddling lies as history.
For a complete timeline that spans more than just the day of 9/11, please visit the Complete 9/11 Timeline.
Faith FM guests include: Bob McIlvaine, lost son in 9/11 attacks, New York, NY., Tony Szamboti, mechanical engineer, Blackwood, NJ., Mike Bondi, systems engineer, Stratford, ON., Laurie Manwell, Ph.D. candidate, author: In Denial of Democracy, Kitchener, ON.
Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. It would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.
Modern Steel High-Rises Don’t Collapse Like a House of Cards
Despite Catastrophic Damage
Those of us attempting to present the evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers to the “uninitiated” can meet with significant psychological resistance. Some respond to the scientific forensic evidence quite readily. But some do not.
WTC 3 severely damaged from the South Tower debris. No complete collapse. The North Tower is yet to come down on top of it.
Another way to open the minds of skeptics – without getting technical at all – is to compare the other WTC buildings that did not actually collapse to the three that collapsed completely. Show the following photos to your stubborn interlocutor. Ask him or her to notice how severely damaged these other buildings were by the debris from the Twin Towers, yet substantial portions remained upright. And ask “Why?”.
WTC 3 after the North Tower's debris rained down on it. Still some portions remain intact.
Many have compared the severe damage that WTC 3 sustained to the minimal damage that WTC 7 sustained, and wondered how WTC 7 could have collapsed so completely – like a house of cards – uniformly, symmetrically, and at free-fall acceleration as fast as a bowling ball falling off the top of it.
Blast waves are visible on WTC #7. Many windows are ejected from the building or dislodged, while the penthouse on top “collapses.” NIST wants you to think this building came down from anything but controlled demolitions, they would love it you believe that fire brought it down! If you don’t think this looks like a fire, but more like a controlled demolition you should visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and sign their petition.
“The day we see the truth and cease to speak is the day we begin to die.”
-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Dear Friends,
We would like to extend our deepest thanks to Mark Stepnoski for generously offering $10,000 to match all donations made to the BuildingWhat?campaign during the last three days of 2010. Supporters across the country and around the world rose to the occasion, giving nearly $30,000 on top of Mark’s $10,000 to bring the campaign to $67,000. Thank you all for your generous support and your belief in our strategy.
In the next few weeks we will be releasing a series of brand new TV ads. Without giving anything away, we are confident in saying these new ads will generate much publicity and create a groundswell of public demand for a new Building 7 investigation leading up to the 10th Anniversary.
ACTION ITEM
To help pave the way towards that day, we have an important action item that will take you only two minutes to complete. Please help us send 500emails to the Speaker of the New York City Council to inform her that 2010 was only the beginning of our campaign, and our calls for the empanelment an independent commission to investigate Building 7 will grow as the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 approaches.
A Freedom of Information reply from the New York City Department of Buildings reports that copies of city permits for routine or major construction work within World Trade Center building 7 during the years 1999, 2000 and 2001 could not be located. Records for the “ALT 2” category were requested.
“DOB divides construction work into two main categories: New Buildings (NB) and Alterations (ALT). Alterations are further divided into three types—ALT1s, ALT2s and ALT3s—depending upon the scope of work. An ALT1 is a major alteration in which the use or occupancy of an existing property changes. An ALT2 is an alteration in which the use or occupancy of a facility does not change, but includes multiple work types, i.e., plumbing and construction. ALT1s and ALT2s must be filed by a registered architect or licensed engineer.”
The BuildingWhat? campaign is pleased to announce beginning today, December 29, through December 31, NFL great Mark Stepnoski will match, up to $10,000, all donations made to the next TV ad campaign.
Thanks to the generosity of supporters across the globe, the BuildingWhat? campaign has raised almost $30,000 since the launch of the new fundraising drive on December 5. We are thrilled and grateful that two-time Superbowl champion Mark Stepnoski has so generously stepped forward to spur us toward the $50,000-milestone. Between now and the end of the year, Mark will match every dollar you donate; and just a reminder, every dollar you do give in 2010 will be fully tax-deductible when you file your taxes in the coming months!
Galileo was the first to describe the amazing fact that, apart from air resistance, all objects fall at the same “rate.” If you have not experienced this fact directly, try dropping a large rock and a pebble side-by- side. The rate we are referring to is not a “speed,” because for a falling object the speed is constantly changing. The rate we are talking about is actually the “rate of increase of speed,” how quickly the speed builds up, called acceleration. The acceleration achieved by all falling bodies, apart from air resistance, is called the “acceleration of gravity.”
Gravity causes freely falling objects to increase their speed by about 32 ft/s per second. (The awkward unit, feet per second per second is commonly abbreviated ft/s2.) When an object is dropped, the speed is initially zero, but it immediately starts speeding up. After 1 second its speed will be 32 ft/s. After 2 seconds its speed will be 64 ft/s. Etc. 32 ft/s2 is an approximation. The “acceleration of gravity” actually varies slightly from place to place. In New York City it is 32.159 ft/s2.
Posted by Brian 
