WTC #2 Exploding

January 13, 2012

Nor Cal Truth   Jan 13, 2011

YouTube user 71gerry has been uploading some very high quality clips of the WTC destruction.  These should be viewed in Full Screen and in the highest quality available.

From the uploader:

Enhanced segment of a recent FOIA response at 1/4 speed, zoomed, and contrasted.

The version below is ”slightly improved,” and has a longer running time. Also viewable is the initial tilt of the top section:

Read the rest of this entry »


FAQ # 7: Squibs

December 11, 2011

source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth    Dec 11, 2011

Q:

What caused the “squibs”? Could they have been just puffs of dust being pushed out of the Towers by falling floors? Are they visual evidence of explosive charges?

A:

The isolated ejections 20-60 stories below the demolition front appear to be composed of pulverized building materials, including concrete. There was no known mechanism by which pulverized building materials being created up at the zone of destruction could have been transported so far down through the building and to the exterior. Air conditioning vents would not have tolerated such pressures, and there was no other “channel” in the building to deliver “compressed air”.

There is no reason, on the “dust puff” theory, for such blasts to be as isolated as they were.  Massive air pressure which would delivered by the (missing) “pile driver” down through the elevator hoist ways and out through a given floor would have broken most or all windows on that floor – not created the highly focalized pin-point ejections that are seen on the videos. The breakage of one or two windows on a given floor would not have relieved enough pressure across an entire floor area to prevent the breakage of many other windows nearby.

Images like this one reveal that the squibs were not merely puffs of air, as they have the same hue and consistency as pulverized solid building materials

Multiple analyses have shown that the ejection speed of the squibs was too high, at 100+ mph, to have been the result of air pressure. These are explosive speeds. They have also been clocked at 160 to 200 feet per second.

Another problem with the “dust puff” theory is that the pulverized building materials would not have been transported so quickly.  Air would have been pushed ahead of such materials, resulting in transparent puffs of air flowing through the freshly broken windows.
Physicist David Chandler has also shown that some of these ejections came from the corners of the buildings. Since there are no windows on the corners, these ejections could not have been the result of air pressure.

Read the rest of this entry »


Video Clip: The Complete Destruction of WTC #2

January 31, 2011

Nor Cal Truth    Jan 31, 2011

This video clip is another example of the sheer speed in which the structure of the buildings were demolished.

The roof section is maintaining the structure of itself until it disappears behind the smoke for a second: It then reappears just as the clip is ending. What reappears is the steel facade of WTC #2 without any of the connections to the roof, floors or trusses. All the concrete seems to be turning into dust, debris and cloud.

Without explosives or incendiary devices a building could not perform this kind of destruction on its own, there is simply not enough energy.


South Tower Smoking Guns — A new AE911Truth YouTube video by David Chandler

August 22, 2009

This view of the destruction of the South Tower of the World Trade Center displays a remarkable number of features that support the interpretation that it was destroyed by explosives. I want to acknowledge the tremendous service provided by Nate Flach who serves as the defacto “video archivist” for AE911Truth. He is the one who first called this video to my attention, because of the huge number of simultaneous squibs on the west side of the building above the impact point.

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers