New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions

October 14, 2010

by Paul Joseph Watson  source: InfoWars    Oct 14, 2010

Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.

The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.

The fact that NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of controlled demolition is another smoking gun.

The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.

The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.

At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.

Read the rest of this entry »


(Another) 9/11 Explosion and Light Flash Eyewitness on 81st Floor South Tower

October 13, 2010

Nor Cal Truth   Oct 13, 2010

Explosions and light flashes are desrcribed by eyewitness Mike Benfante on 9/11.  This video is part of the NIST cumulus data released via FOIA.

Thanks to IranContraScumdid9/11.


9/11 Explosions, Human Experimentation, Bankers Break In – Sunday Update Corbettreport

October 12, 2010

source: Corbett Report     Oct 12, 2010

SOURCES AND DOCUMENTATION:

Firefighters Talk About Secondary Explosions in WTC
http://ur1.ca/20wkp

Man Describes Explosion in Basement of WTC
http://ur1.ca/20wkw

Read the rest of this entry »


9/11 FOIA: Audible Pops and Explosions

October 7, 2010

Nor Cal Truth    Oct 7th, 2010

Explosions are clearly audible in this video  posted by IranContraScumdid911. This is part of the ongoing NIST cumulus footage that has been released to the public because of the International Center for 9/11 Studies.

Video the government felt was not necessary to show the public, released September 2010. 11:00am to 12:00pm September 11, 2001 – Richard Peskin Video


BOMBSHELL: FOIA Sep 11th Video – 9/11 Firemen Witnesses Second, Third Explosions In WTC Lobby

October 6, 2010

by Brian Romanoff    Nor Cal Truth   Oct 6, 2010

YouTube user Iran-ContraScumdid911 has posted some amazing new videos relating to 9/11. The video below comes from a 2010 FOIA request,  part of the NIST Cumulus Data diligently acquired by the International Center or 9/11 Studies.

Make copies.

 “We was in an explosion. We was in the lobby.. and they fucking….the third explosion..the whole lobby collapsed in on us.”

“..definitely a secondary explosion.”

“On our way upstairs, the whole fucking thing blew.”

“Then there was a third one (explosion).”

“Everything just let loose in the building.”

“Three explosions after that (plane strike), we came in after the fire had started.”

“It was so surreal, it was like a movie set.”

“People don’t understand, there may be more, any one of these fucking buildings could blow up. This ain’t done yet.”

“..in the building trying to help people, and it’s exploding on you inside the building.”


Eyewitness to Explosions on 9/11/01

September 19, 2010

Nor Cal Truth    Sep 19, 2010

This is from the International Center for 9/11 Studies YouTube Channel:

More importantly is this account from Jeremy Fox:

Jeremy Fox:  When it went off….   The second building….  It…    You saw an explosion and then you just saw a humongous cloud of smoke go up and you saw the building start to fall down and then you saw the core of the building just start to disintegrate into itself..

Read the rest of this entry »


WTC Detonations Finally Revealed: Int. Center 9/11 Studies FOIA Results

September 6, 2010

In the recently released clip showing an explosive ejection of mass, you can watch one of these streamers as it appears to peel from a column in a straight line…
then that straight line ignites, like a cutter charge:

The above is from the comments section of the story below, I recommend visiting the source sometime to review all the comments.

by: BoneZ   source: 9/11 Blogger  Sep 6, 2010

Recently, there was a post on 9/11 Blogger (here) with videos released by NIST. I took the video with the audible detonations and ran it through an audio editor as the audio was very low and only worked in the right channel (speaker) and had no left channel audio. I raised the audio and changed the stereo output to mono so that the audio can be heard in both speakers.

I then added some witness testimony to corroborate what we are hearing:

Read the rest of this entry »


Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion?

September 3, 2010

Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion? 020910topa

by Paul J. Watson   source: Infowars    Sep 3, 2010

After filing a lawsuit that prompted NIST to release more than 3 terabytes of photographs and videos from their investigation into the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies has obtained evidence that suggests NIST edited several videos of the collapse of Building 7 in order to hide evidence of a controlled implosion.

The Center filed a FOIA Request with NIST on January 26, 2009, seeking production of “all of the photographs and videos collected, reviewed, cited or in any other way used by NIST during its investigation of the World Trade Center building collapses.” Following several unsuccessful attempts to get NIST to even acknowledge receipt of the Request, the Center was forced to file a lawsuit on May 28, 2009. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the Request was assigned a reference number, and NIST began periodically releasing batches of responsive records.

The Center has now begun posting some of those images and videos online, the first batch of which is from an external hard disk drive “NIST WTC Investigation Cumulus Video Clips.”

In one of the clips, the video of which has been in the public domain for years, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.

However, in subsequent clips released by NIST, where the camera is located nearer to the building, the collapse of the penthouse is clearly edited out of the footage.

Read the rest of this entry »


International Center for 9/11 Studies Secures Release of Thousands of Photos and Videos from NIST

September 2, 2010

source: 9/11 Blogger     Sep 2, 2010

The International Center for 9/11 Studies has secured the release of hundreds of hours of video footage and tens of thousands of photographs used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for its investigation of the collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7. This material is being released to the Center under the Freedom of Information Act, in response to a lawsuit the Center filed against NIST.

The Center filed a FOIA Request with NIST on January 26, 2009, seeking production of “all of the photographs and videos collected, reviewed, cited or in any other way used by NIST during its investigation of the World Trade Center building collapses.” Following several unsuccessful attempts to get NIST to even acknowledge receipt of the Request, the Center was forced to file a lawsuit on May 28, 2009. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the Request was assigned a reference number, and NIST began periodically releasing batches of responsive records. To date, the Center has received over 300 DVDs and several external hard disk drives that contain responsive records – more than 3 terabytes of data so far – and NIST has indicated that additional records will be released in the future.

We are currently looking at the best ways to distribute these materials to interested researchers and journalists around the world. It has taken NIST more than 8 months so far to produce a partial archive of photographs and videos in their possession, but we hope to be more efficient in our efforts. Because of the huge volume of data, we are working on a wiki-style website to facilitate review and discussion of any interesting items that are discovered by researchers.

Read the rest of this entry »


Smoke and Explosions at the Ground Levels of WTC on 9/11

September 1, 2010

by Nor Cal Truth        Sep 1, 2010

The following video contains footage of the South Tower’s “collapse”. Before the debris hits the ground, you will see an explosion in the foreground of the South Tower. The explosion seems to continue into a second, more powerful explosion: It may also be multiple, succesive explosions - it is hard to tell. Conveniently, the ground-level explosion’s dust and debris is, within seconds, smothered by the dust and debris from the South Tower’s “collapse”.

The following video is from before the “collapse” of the South Tower. Notice the extreme damage to the area of the parking lot near the walkway, the same area as the video above but minutes before the “collapse”. The video then shows a photograph of smoke billowing out of the ground floor of the South Tower well before the collapse. 

Read the rest of this entry »


Coast to Coast AM 9/11 debate with Richard Gage and Dave Thomas

August 23, 2010

source: World for 9/11 Truth     Aug 23, 2010 

Coast to Coast AM 9/11 debate with Richard Gage and Dave Thomas

On Saturday August 21st, 2010, Richard Gage, AIA from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Dave Thomas a physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason, joined Ian Punnett on Coast to Coast AM for the entire program of 4 hours to debate how the World Trade Center buildings collapsed on September 11, 2001.

Physicist Kim Johnson and chemist Niels Harrit joined the discussion in hour three.

Coast to Coast AM airs on more than 500 stations in the U.S., as well as Canada, Mexico and Guam, and is heard by nearly three million weekly listeners. With hosts George Noory, George Knapp (weekend) and Ian Punnett (weekend), it is the most listened to overnight radio program in North America.

Coast to Coast AM Debate

    Part 1 of 11

    Part 2 of 11

Read the rest of this entry »


9/11 PLANNERS CONFESS ON NETWORK TELEVISION

August 22, 2010

FOR OUR FRIENDS WHO STILL DON’T GET IT

by Gordon Duff  source: Veterans Today   Aug 22, 2010

How can a nation like the United States be duped into two wars and total bankruptcy?  It would be one thing if the “truth” about 9/11 was internet conspiracy theory.  This isn’t the case, it was all right there, in everyone’s livingroom.  They fooled us once and then fooled us again and again.  Yes, America has some tail to kick but this time, maybe we should make sure our boot goes up the right rear end for a change.

The real hole in the Pentagon, before construction equipment enlarged it was so small a man had to duck his head to enter.  For 9 years, this photograph was captioned “Second Floor.”  This photograph has a firefighter in the foreground and, unless gravity was suspended on 9/11, he is standing on the Pentagon’s lawn.  Listen to CNN describe a crash site with no aircraft parts of any kind, seats, bodies, wings, engines, tail section….none of it.  Can it be this simple?

The CNN reporter at the Pentagon immediately after the “crash” found no aircraft debris.   After closing off the site, the next morning, huge pieces of plane were hauled away, pieces that weren’t in any of the photographs on 9/11.  I hate it when media stooges scripted by the real terrorists don’t check the time carefully enough.

Read the rest of this entry »


Blue Cross Hang up with 9/11 Victim Story adds more Evidence of Low Level Explosions at WTC

August 14, 2010

by Brian Romanoff     Nor Cal Truth    Aug 14, 2010

The following selections come from a news story about a woman who was injured on 9/11, and is being denied compensation for her injuries by the Blue Cross, for whom she worked:

At exactly 17 minutes to 9 o’clock on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Marie Luzzicone gave her boss a wave and stepped alone into an elevator on the 19th floor of Tower 1 in the World Trade Center.The door closed, and Marie “felt like we hit rock.”

A month shy of nine years later, the 60-year-old Tottenville 9/11 survivor is still caught between a rock and a hard place over a workers’ compensation claim that was four days late.

“Not because of my negligence,” Marie says, “it’s Blue Cross that waited five weeks to give me approval.”

Look at what Marie remembers seeing on the 10th floor:

Read the rest of this entry »


WTC 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

July 7, 2010

source: 9/11 Speakout   July 7, 2010

There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues. This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 99 other followers