Milo is the host of Touch, a daily program from 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific on The Bridge, 95.1 FM in Guerneville. Milo has invited me (Brian Romanoff) to be a regular guest on his show to try to bring more light into the events of 9/11. I appreciate the opportunity and I hope you enjoy the show.
This week we discussthe big NIST lie of finding no evidence for explosions during the WTC collapse investigation.
Listen here:
Available as a live-stream every Monday 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific at the website provided below:
by Aidan Monaghan source: 9/11 Blogger oct 5, 2011
Within a September 13, 2011 FOI response from the New City Department of Buildings (DoB), it is noted that World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 have been deemed sensitive buildings and thus, plans for these buildings have been exempted from disclosure by statute because “if disclosed, the documents requested would endanger the life or safety of any person.”
The DoB reply also affirms a previous finding that no elevator records whatsoever were located regarding the extensive elevator modernization within WTC buildings 1 and 2, one of the largest ever.[1] Additionally, the DoB reply advises that the Port Authority of NY/NJ are not under the jurisdiction of the NYC DoB and that records for major pre-9/11 renovations may not have been submitted to the DoB.
The Port Authority of NY/NJ have previously advised within FOI records that records for major pre-9/11 renovations within WTC buildings 1 and 2 were destroyed on September 11, 2001.[2]
by David Chandler source: 9/11 Blogger Sep 26, 2011
I have uploaded to YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvw0_i1rGns) an analysis of the acceleration of a projectile that races ahead of the surrounding falling debris. I had discussed this object before but due to the difficulty caused by a moving camera I had not previously measured the motion directly.
The object (apparently a perimeter wall unit) raced ahead of its neighboring debris, but its acceleration was about 1/3 of gravity. This is an indication that it was kicked downward initially by an explosion, after which the air resistance partially canceled the effect of gravity as it approached terminal velocity. As it fell, however, there was an outburst of white smoke, at which point the projectile changed directions, slightly, and accelerated downward for about a half second at 1.5 times gravity. It then fell back to continued acceleration a little under 1 g.
The acceleration of the projectile is unambiguous proof that very energetic material was applied to the wall unit. What I found particularly surprising is that the ignition of the material in an unconfined space where it was free to expand three dimensionally would provide sufficient thrust due to expanding gasses alone to cause what was probably a 4-ton wall unit to accelerate 50% faster than gravity. The fact that the unit continued to accelerate close to freefall thereafter is an indication of an ongoing thrust capable of largely canceling the effect of air resistance.
A 9/11 TV ad voiced by Ed Asner has just been created with designs on running in New York and other major markets in time for the 10th anniversary. The 30-second spot combines Asner’s narration with footage of the 3 towers’ destruction and forces the viewer to decide what they are witnessing as it promotes AE911Truth.
Live debate between Richard Gage (www.AE911Truth.org) and Chris Mohr, journalist and advocate for the theory of “natural collapse.”
Richard and Chris will be debating in public Sunday March 6th 5pm at the University Memorial Center Room 235 Colorado University in Boulder. A video of that debate will be released subsequently.
(The interview/debate starts about 1/3 of the way into the download)
Blast waves are visible on WTC #7. Many windows are ejected from the building or dislodged, while the penthouse on top “collapses.” NIST wants you to think this building came down from anything but controlled demolitions, they would love it you believe that fire brought it down! If you don’t think this looks like a fire, but more like a controlled demolition you should visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and sign their petition.
WTC tenants, both companies and employees; security and design firms and their board members involved in redesigning and implementing the new security system after the 1993 basement bombing; companies and individuals involved in the clean-up of ground zero. Who had the means, access, motivation and who profited.
To open the show in a Windows Media Player format please click here. Or click the link below:
The presentation will shine light on the attacks of 9/11/01 for those who have not revisited the subject in a while and skeptics are encouraged to ask questions afterwords. Richard Gage is backed by over 1,300 other architects and engineers that look at the science behind the 3 building collapses on 9/11; their research says that controlled demolitions were used on World Trade Center #1, #2 and #7.
Cooperage is on the Sonoma State University Campus.
Directions to Sonoma State University can be found here.
Please visit the source of this article! Vote on the poll that is offered. Last I looked there was over 64% support for Kevin Bracken, who is questioning the official 9/11 story!
This video, narrated by actor Daniel Sunjata (Rescue Me, The Bronx is Burning), compares the potential of Building 7‘s footage with the effect the Zapruder Film had on the American people.
Note from Nor Cal Truth:
I know that financially speaking, the times are tough for most of us, but if you can donate $100.00 to this epic campaign – DO IT TODAY! The breakdowns of views-per-donation are very inspiring; $100.00 = 2,500 viewers or $400.00 = 10,000 viewers! Even a simple donation of $25.00 = 625 viewers or $50.o0 = 1,250 viewers!
Thanks for considering, and my best to all you out there.
Below is the 30 second ad from the families of 9/11 victims, bringing attention to World Trade Center #7:
FLIR is thermal imaging, or Forward Looking Infared. Here we have a video of thermal “hot spots” in the towers before their “collapse” on 9/11/01. Obviously there are 2 massive heat signatures coming from the plane impact areas and subsequent fires on each tower. However there is other heat signatures that are far harder to explain, unless you explore the other controlled demolition and thermite evidence. - Nor Cal Truth
(This is not in any way an endorsement of Keith Olbermann)
Aug 27, 2010
Watch the below videos to see that although Donna mentions “19 criminals”, she has asked and is still asking many questions about 9/11. She has attended and spoken at more than one 9/11 truth event. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by Brian 
