source: We Are Change Sep 2, 2011
There are so many unanswered questions about the days 9/11….
Ask questions, demand answers. We Are Patriots, We Are Fearless because We Are Change.
Special special thanks to William Rodriguez http://www.william911.com/ and Eugene V for being there with me.
http://www.facebook.com/lukewearechange
http://www.twitter.com/lukerudkowski
http://www.wearechange.org
Leave a Comment » | 
9/11, building 7, Larry Silverstein, we are change | Tagged: 9/11, collapse, destruction, escorted out, Larry Silverstein, luke rudkowski, WTC 7 | 
Permalink
Posted by Brian
source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Aug. 18, 2011
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is pleased to announce the launch of the Remember Building 7 10th Anniversary Campaign – the most aggressive ad campaign yet. This season we are accelerating our strategic partnership with RememberBuilding7.org in order to make this 10th Anniversary a vital turning point in the pursuit of a new 9/11 investigation.
In conjunction with the Remember Building 7 Campaign, we are very proud today to also release our powerful new 15-minute mini-documentary “Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7” as the essential educational component of the new campaign and an exceptional tool for all people who want to effectively expose the fraudulent official story of WTC 7’s destruction and the explosive evidence omitted from the NIST Report. It is compellingly narrated by actor Ed Asner andfeatures a stellar lineup of AE911Truth experts including structural engineers, chemical engineers, physicists and others.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, collapse, family, members, Remember Building 7, victims, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Mar 6, 2011
No Lies Radio will be broadcasting the debate live (and archiving it).
http://noliesradio.org/archives/30994
Please CLICK HERE to listen to the live debate starting at 4:00 pm Pacific time, Sunday, March 6.
This is from the Colorado 9/11 Visibility:
Colorado 9/11 Visibility is pleased to announce a live debate addressing the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001
Sunday afternoon, March 6th, at the Boulder campus of the University of Colorado, Colorado 9/11 Visibility will host a debate between Richard Gage, AIA (American Institute of Architects), and Chris Mohr, Denver investigative journalist.
The question: What brought down the three World Trade Center skyscrapers?
Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He has been an architect for over 23 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings. His quest for the truth about 9/11 began in 2006, and he subsequently founded Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Chris Mohr, investigative journalist and advocate of the “natural collapse” theory, is a sincere seeker of the truth who has extensively researched the collapses of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings, consulted with independent physicists and engineers, and passionately argues that the buildings collapsed due to the plane impacts and fires.
In November 2010 at Denver’s Mercury Café, Mohr debated attorney Earl Staelin on the collapse of the twin towers. This debate was unprecedented in its civility and professionalism.
In the upcoming March 6th debate with Richard Gage, the discussion will explore not only the collapse of the twin towers, but also that of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which collapsed completely at 5:21 pm on 9/11/01. For those of you not familiar with the collapse of WTC7, this is a riveting, don’t-miss controversy. We look forward to a dynamic, respectful, and thoroughly informative exploration of these topics.
We are pleased to announce that radio personality Tom Kiely of INN World Report will be the moderator for this debate!
This is a rare opportunity! Please send this announcement to your contacts and invite them to join you at the debate, in particular those who would be especially interested in hearing both sides of this controversial issue.
We believe that both sides debating respectfully, yet passionately, will have a strong impact in making “what happened on 9/11″ a legitimate subject for public discourse. Therefore, due to the importance and uniqueness of this event, Colorado 9/11 Visibility has commissioned a professional video team to film the debate and produce a high-quality program suitable for television broadcast, along with a DVD for distribution.
We need your help. This is an expensive endeavor, and we cannot continue to do work on this seminal issue without funds. We need donations, both large and small. Please go here to donate at this website, or send a check made out to Colorado 9/11 Visibility and send to Fran Shure, 1841 S. Sherman St., Denver, CO 80210.
To learn more as well as link to the archive of the warm-up radio debate, see the article at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
2 Comments | 9/11, building 7, Professionals for 9/11 truth, Richard Gage | Tagged: 9/11, chris mohr, collapse, colorado, debate, Richard Gage, towers | Permalink
Posted by Brian
by Michael Cook source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Jan 23, 2011
Modern Steel High-Rises Don’t Collapse Like a House of Cards
Despite Catastrophic Damage
Those of us attempting to present the evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers to the “uninitiated” can meet with significant psychological resistance. Some respond to the scientific forensic evidence quite readily. But some do not.
WTC 3 severely damaged from the South Tower debris. No complete collapse. The North Tower is yet to come down on top of it.
Another way to open the minds of skeptics – without getting technical at all – is to compare the other WTC buildings that did not actually collapse to the three that collapsed completely. Show the following photos to your stubborn interlocutor. Ask him or her to notice how severely damaged these other buildings were by the debris from the Twin Towers, yet substantial portions remained upright. And ask “Why?”.
World Trade Center Building Three was also known as the World Trade Center Hotel, the New York Marriott Hotel, or the Vista Hotel.
WTC 3 after the North Tower's debris rained down on it. Still some portions remain intact.
Many have compared the severe damage that WTC 3 sustained to the minimal damage that WTC 7 sustained, and wondered how WTC 7 could have collapsed so completely – like a house of cards – uniformly, symmetrically, and at free-fall acceleration as fast as a bowling ball falling off the top of it.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7 | Tagged: 2, 9/11, buildings, collapse, demolition, WTC 1, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Nor Cal Truth Oct 25, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVvp3_RMCD8
A very clear explosion can be heard at about the 00:02 second mark. Just before the penthouse on top collapses. Turn your speakers up a little.
This is more footage that was recently obtained via the FOIA pursued by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. This was found on the YouTube user, IranContraScumdid911.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7, Film/Video | Tagged: 9/11, audible, building 7, collapse, demolitions, explosions, FOIA, NIST, video, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Please also visit: 9/11 Blogger Sep 16, 2010
Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn’t matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone “thinks”. Nothing can fool the laws of physics.
Please also visit physics and reason’s YouTube channel.
2 Comments | 9/11, Film/Video | Tagged: 9/11, collapse, experiments, NIST, truth, video | Permalink
Posted by Brian
source: Building What? Sep 8, 2010
This video, narrated by actor Daniel Sunjata (Rescue Me, The Bronx is Burning), compares the potential of Building 7‘s footage with the effect the Zapruder Film had on the American people.
Note from Nor Cal Truth:
I know that financially speaking, the times are tough for most of us, but if you can donate $100.00 to this epic campaign – DO IT TODAY! The breakdowns of views-per-donation are very inspiring; $100.00 = 2,500 viewers or $400.00 = 10,000 viewers! Even a simple donation of $25.00 = 625 viewers or $50.o0 = 1,250 viewers!
Thanks for considering, and my best to all you out there.
Below is the 30 second ad from the families of 9/11 victims, bringing attention to World Trade Center #7:
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, 9/11 Victims Families, building 7 | Tagged: 9/11, ad, assasination, building 7, Building what?!, collapse, demolitions, families, film, new york, WTC 7, zapruder | Permalink
Posted by Brian
source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Sep 8, 2010
Noted author David McCulloch once wrote, “History is a guide to navigation in perilous times.” Indeed, if history is a guide, one can look at high-rise building fires that have occurred in the past to address the issue of building safety. This review includes the fires that the 9/11 Commission concluded caused the collapse of the WTC Twin Towers, and WTC 7, for which officials declared the collapse was due to fires. Two high-rise fires listed below occurred after 9/11 and are especially noteworthy.
The history of high-rise, steel-framed buildings spans only about 100 years. Still, there are a number of very hot, large, and long lasting fires to review. One in particular, the Empire State Building, suffered a severe fire when it was struck by a B-25 bomber. The fire was fueled by high-octane gasoline, when the plane hit the 78th and 79th floors. Here’s a look at some high-rise fires through history, listed chronologically.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11 | Tagged: 9/11, buildings, collapse, fires, steel, wtc | Permalink
Posted by Brian
In the recently released clip showing an explosive ejection of mass, you can watch one of these streamers as it appears to peel from a column in a straight line…
…then that straight line ignites, like a cutter charge:
The above is from the comments section of the story below, I recommend visiting the source sometime to review all the comments.
by: BoneZ source: 9/11 Blogger Sep 6, 2010
Recently, there was a post on 9/11 Blogger (here) with videos released by NIST. I took the video with the audible detonations and ran it through an audio editor as the audio was very low and only worked in the right channel (speaker) and had no left channel audio. I raised the audio and changed the stereo output to mono so that the audio can be heard in both speakers.
I then added some witness testimony to corroborate what we are hearing:
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, demolitions, Film/Video | Tagged: 9/11, collapse, detonations, explosions, flashes, sounds, streamers, thermite, World Trade Towers, wtc | Permalink
Posted by Brian
by Shawn Hamilton source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Sep 5, 2010
It’s clear from primary sources of evidence that quite a few people believed Building 7 was going to collapse. Such perceptive anticipation might be easy to understand if it was common for modern steel-frame skyscrapers to collapse from fires. But since this had never happened prior to September 11, 2001, we have to ask ourselves why the collapse was so easy to predict. The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth suspect foul play. Ubiquitous evidence of foreknowledge adds support to the hypothesis that explosives were used to demolish Building 7.
Witnesses on the scene included construction workers, firefighters, and police. One witness, a first-year New York University medical student named Daryl, was interviewed for WINS NYC News Radio live on the evening of September 11, 2001:
“We were watching the building [WTC 7] actually ‘cause it was on fire…. The bottom floors of the building were on fire and…we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder…turned around— we were shocked to see that the building was – ah – well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building, and all the windows started busted out. It was horrifying,” he said. “About a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that… We saw the building crash all the way to the ground. We were in shock.”
The “sound of a clap of thunder” and “the presence of a “shock wave ripping through the building” are indicative of an explosive blast, as is the shattering of windows.
In this startling landmark 9/11 video clip captured by CNN, a construction worker turns around after hearing an explosion from WTC 7 and notes “Did you hear that?
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7 | Tagged: building 7, collapse, demolition, early, fires, knowledge, precognitive dissonance, steel, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
by David Chandler source: Stepping out of Babylon w/ Sue Supriano Aug 11, 2010
On July 19, while I was in Portland to speak at the American Association of Physics Teachers conference I was interviewed by former KPFA programmer Sue Supriano, who now lives in Portland and does radio and podcast interviews for a show called “Stepping Out of Babylon.” The interview can be downloaded as an mp3 file and is available here:
http://www.suesupriano.com/audio/DavidChandler.mp3
David Chandler is a physics teacher, a Quaker peace activist, and an independent 9/11 researcher, active with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and on the board of the International Center for 9/11 Studies. He noticed that something was amiss with the way the buildings fell on 9/11 and did precise measurements of the motions associated with the building collapses and straightforwardly applied Newton’s laws of motion to show what this implied about the forces at work.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11. physics, collapse, david chandler, interview, sue supriano, towers | Permalink
Posted by Brian
source: Examiner Aug 11, 2010
Anders Björkman is a structural engineer from France who became an early member of Richard Gage’s AE911Truth. He had previously given speeches in his country to people whose children had seen footage of the Trade Towers’ destruction and were worried that buildings could collapse from the top down. He reassured these parents that this couldn’t happen and posted his presentation on his web site where it gradually developed.
.jpg) |
| Anders Björkman |
Björkman became a formal critic of the “Progressive Collapse” or “Piledriver” theory promoted by Dr. Zdenek Bazant, a consultant for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in its work on 9-11. The Piledriver Theory basically posits that prolonged heating weakened the support columns of a single floor which caused the upper section to crush what was below it in a chain-reaction all the way to the bottom.
“I explained on my website that you cannot destroy a building by dropping the top on the bottom; you have to destroy it from the bottom,” Björkman said. “Then a lot of people criticized that and said, ‘But Dr. Bazant says the opposite, and he has written all these papers,’ so of course I looked at these papers, and said, ‘This Bazant is nonsense.’ But others said, ‘But he’s peer-reviewed. It has been published in a scientific journal—the Journal of Engineering Mechanics.’”
Björkman contacted Ross Corotis, the journal’s editor, saying Bazant was incorrect and asking if he could write a response to the article. Corotis said yes, so Björkman wrote what he called “a very simple article” and submitted it in early February to the journal. In June Corotis contacted Björkman and told him the intended to publish it, but first Björkman needed to sign a copyright agreement, which he immediately returned. In September Björkman contacted the journal to investigate the delay and was told Corotis was waiting for Bazant to submit “closure” or his response to Björkman’s response. Björkman’s article and Bazant’s response were finally published in July of 2010.
Björkman explains why he vigorously disputes Bazant’s “Piledriver” idea.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, Bjorkman, collapse, NIST, piledriver theory, science, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
In case you have not seen it, this was an interview I had with Tom during the Architects and Engineers / Firefighters for 9/11 Truth event last year. -Brian at Nor Cal Truth
source: 9/11 Blogger May 10 2010
This past weekend, 5/8/2010, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth held a conference in the San Francisco area to discuss their work. One of the guest speakers was a gentleman by the name of Tom Sullivan who had previously worked for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI), owned and operated by the Loizeaux family.
Tom Sullivan worked for CDI about 10 years ago before and during 9/11, and he worked for CDI for almost 3 years. His roll with CDI was Site Photographer/Explosives Technician. He is also licensed by the FDNY to handle explosives. His explosives tech. duties included placing explosives in buildings to prepare them for demolition.
Sullivan worked on projects such as Seattle King Dome, Three Rivers Stadium, Philadelphia Naval Hospital, Key Span Gas Holders, among others. He also went to high-school with Doug Loizeaux of CDI as well. Sullivan has also published work in the book “Implosion” published by Black Dog Publishing.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, demolitions, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, CDI, collapse, Controlled Demolition Inc, demolitions, Richard Gage, thermite, tiom sulivan, wtc | Permalink
Posted by Brian
By Anders Bjorkman source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth March 21, 2010
The below Discussion to Paper was submitted to ASCE – Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 3 February 2009 and approved for publication 3 June 2009, apparently awaiting a reply or Closure by Messrs. Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson, that has not come forward 15 December 2009.The illustrations, figures 1-8 did not form part of the original submission to ASCE-JEM but are added here for easy verification of observations. As ASCE/JEM are delaying publication, I have decided to publish it (at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) today. Comments are always welcome at anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr
Discussion to Paper (3 February, 2009 – final 3 June, 2009)
(Also as Power Point presentation + nice figures)
Discussion of “What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York” by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 134 (2008), [1]
I have read subject article by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson (BLGB) with great interest and would like to make the following observations:
There is no need to describe the destruction of WTC1 using differential equations. Simple math + observations of videos prove the BLGB model and paper wrong.
BLGB suggests that upper part C (of WTC1) drops on the lower structure of WTC1 – part A – that is one-way crushed in 97 steps until ground.
Fig. 1 – The Bazant & Co crush-down theory applied to a structure consisting of five assemblies of structural elements – one upper part C and four lower parts A; All parts consists 95% of air. Each part has height h. Thus total structure has height 5 h.
2 Comments | 9/11, demolitions, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, collapse, demolitions, explosions, September 11, Twin Towers | Permalink
Posted by Brian
