An Interview with Physicist David Chandler

January 16, 2011

by John Bursill  source: Visiblity 9/11    Jan 16, 2011

This timely and important Podcast is a MUST listen!

Download mp3

David, who describes himself as a pacifist, talks in great depth about his journey on the campaign for 9/11 Truth and Justice to which he is passionately dedicated. Many of you may be aware that it was David who is credited with getting NIST to admit that WTC Building 7 fell at a an acceleration consistent with freefall due to gravity, which I and many others view as the single most powerful debating tool for us as 9/11 Truth advocates. David disputes that he is solely responsible for this and says that Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and others were central to this achievement but it was his question that drew the answer in the end so it seems. David also talks about the highly political timing and nature of the NIST Building 7 report.

We then move on to talk about David’s new DVD, 9/11 Analysis, which is comprised of a compilation of his most powerful work to date and some new material into one concise resource. This DVD is available for sale now and can be purchased here.

Read the rest of this entry »


New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions

October 14, 2010

by Paul Joseph Watson  source: InfoWars    Oct 14, 2010

Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.

The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.

The fact that NIST dragged their feet for so long in an attempt to block the release of these highly incriminating videos clearly indicates that they were part of an attempted cover-up. In addition, the fact that some of the videos appear to have been edited in an effort to hide evidence of controlled demolition is another smoking gun.

The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.

The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.

At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.

Read the rest of this entry »


David Chandler: 9/11 Analysis DVD

July 9, 2010

July 9, 2010

If you are not familiar with David Chandler’s work, please visit his youtube page  at  http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911


WTC 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

July 7, 2010

source: 9/11 Speakout   July 7, 2010

There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues. This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.


An Analysis of Warrantless Wiretapping-Part II

November 20, 2009

Source: BoilingFrogs

Wednesday, 18. November 2009

Parental Controls on Everyone

In Part one of my piece, I attempted to explain the nature and scope of the US Warrantless Wiretap Program and the growing Surveillance Regime being built in this country. In Part 2, I will compare and contrast the growth and structure of the aforementioned Surveillance Regimes with other countries’ corresponding Systems of surveillance and control. I will also spotlight the International Surveillance Industry and its efforts to market its products by offering this technology to governmental power centers around the world. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers