10 Years from 9/11: Still Important Unanswered Questions

August 8, 2011

by Peter Drew   source: Scoop    Aug 8, 2011

As we approach the 10th anniversary of this world changing event, we are finding that rather than gradually fading into the history books, this event is having an increasing impact on the world we live in and raising more and more complex questions as to what really happened and why much crucial information and evidence has apparently been held back or ignored by both the US government and the media.

The events of 9/11 were shocking and horrific. In their attempts to pursue the supposed perpetrators of these attacks, the US government has invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, has launched significant military action in Pakistan, with huge loss of innocent lives in these three countries, and a global war on terror has been launched against Al Qaeda. But were Al Qaeda the only terrorists involved? Were there possibly other forces and influences also involved that need to be more fully investigated and pursued? Do we really have all the facts and the full story about what happened on that day, or is the 9/11 story a lot more complex than has so far been presented? The evidence that is now emerging would strongly suggest that this is the case and therefore we need to ascertain the full facts if we are to have any chance of achieving true justice for the victims and prevent similar or worse attacks in the future.

Let us start by looking at the official process of investigation into 9/11. In 2003 a panel of 10 investigators was established to conduct a formal investigation into what happened, and this investigation was used to create the 9/11 Commission Report as a document which provided the official version of events. However, a steadily increasing number of people within the United States and around the world have been seriously questioning this official version of events as being incomplete or inaccurate. A rapidly growing amount of compelling evidence is being presented which suggests that at the very least some significant new questions need to be asked and that significant further investigations need to be undertaken if we are to get a more complete picture and an understanding of the full extent of what really happened.

A major factor for consideration is the enormous amount of scientific evidence and eye witness accounts now emerging which suggests that the three towers that collapsed on September 11 came down mainly as a result of explosive demolition as opposed to the spontaneous pancake collapses caused by the intense fire from the planes, as was hypothesised in the 9/11 Commission Report. If explosives were in fact the main cause of the collapses then this raises another whole level of complexity and intrigue to the events of 9/11. It raises questions as to how the terrorists gained access to such highly secure buildings with large quantities of explosives. One of the leading figures in bringing forward scientific evidence regarding the use of explosives is Richard Gage, founder of‘Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’ (AE911Truth). AE911Truth now includes no fewer than 1,500 professionally qualified architects and engineers from across the United States who all believe that the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Centre towers requires a new investigation and a new explanation. The first and most important piece of the 9/11 puzzle, not known by most people, is that as well as the Twin Towers, a third skyscraper completely collapsed on that day. WTC Building 7 was a 47 storey high rise tower that was not even struck by a plane and yet it collapsed at around 5.20pm on September 11, falling at free fall speed for much of the collapse neatly into its own footprint.

Read the rest of this entry »


Album Exposing World Trade Center Building 7 Collapse Tops Billboard Chart

March 22, 2011

Uploaded on Feb 1st, 2011 –  this song has nearly 2.5 million views on YouTube! 

source: AE9/11Truth   Mar 23, 2011

Atlantic Records rap star Lupe Fiasco calls the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 into question on his new album ‘Lasers,’ released March 8, 2011.

In “Words I Never Said,” the new radio single off of ‘Lasers,’ he asks “9/11, building 7: did they really pull it?” (at 0:46)

It is one of three songs selected as “singles” by Atlantic to promote the album. Lupe’s third official release—and first in which he specifically questions the government’s version of events on 9/11/01 with reference to ignored evidence — is the Grammy Award winner’s first #1 album in the United States (all genres), with over 200,000 units sold in its opening week: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1660010/lupe-fiasco-lasers-billboard.jhtml

Read the rest of this entry »


A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse

February 15, 2011

Please visit the source at least once so they know that you cared about this story!

by Michael Fullerton   source: Foreign Policy Journal      Feb 15, 2011

This year will mark the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 disaster. In these 10 years, not only have extremely important scientific questions about this tragedy gone unanswered, but they have even been ridiculed to the point of deranged absurdity. We owe a valid scientific explanation to the 3000 victims on that day, the steadily dying health-stricken first responders, the dead and wounded soldiers, and the untold thousands upon thousands of dead and injured Afghans and Iraqis resulting from the terrifying never-ending “war on terror”. Critics of those skeptical of the official story of 9/11 have often objected that an alternative theory has never been put forth. To that end, this article will put forth a scientific theory for one important aspect of the 9/11 event, the Building 7 collapse.

Read the rest of this entry »


Reward $5000 – $10,000 : WTC7 9/11 Challenge

June 1, 2010

source: Uncensored   June 1, 2010

Michael Fullerton, founder of Vernon 9/11 Truth, is offering $5000 to the first person to provide some specific answers relating to the 9/11 event.

Until July 1st, Okanagan residents can receive $10,000.

Contestants must explain precisely how the official theory of the WTC7 collapse, as supported by NIST (The National Institute of Standards and Technology), does not violate the laws of physics.

NIST maintains WTC7 came down due to fire damage alone. WTC7 was a 47 story building about the width and length of a football field that was not hit by a plane on 9/11.

Contestants must explain how normal oxygen-starved office fires caused 8 stories or about 100 feet of structure including the 58 perimeter columns and 25 massive core columns of WTC7 to be effectively removed simultaneously floor by floor so that the building was able to free fall straight down symmetrically for at least 2.25 seconds.

Read the rest of this entry »


The WTC Leaseholder and His Associates That Cheated Death on 9/11: Was it Coincidence or Foreknowledge?

May 30, 2010

As always, the comments section at 9/11 Blogger have a good discussion being tossed around.

by Shoestring  source: 9/11 Blogger  May 30, 2010

New York real estate developer Larry Silverstein and several key individuals associated with his firm, Silverstein Properties, appear to have had remarkable luck on September 11, 2001, when changes in their schedule or coincidental circumstances saved them from being high up in the World Trade Center when it was attacked.

Silverstein Properties took over the lease of the World Trade Center seven weeks before 9/11, the only time the complex had gone under private control [1], and after 9/11 Larry Silverstein sought damages of over $7 billion from his insurers for the destruction of the Twin Towers. [2] On September 11, the firm had temporary offices on the 88th floor of the North Tower. (American Airlines Flight 11 impacted that tower between its 93rd and 99th floors.) Of its 160 employees, 54 were working in those offices at the time of the attacks and four of them died. [3]

HIGH-LEVEL INDIVIDUALS AVOIDED DANGER ON 9/11
The fortunate circumstances that kept the high-level individuals out of danger the morning of 9/11 were quite extraordinary. Larry Silverstein survived the attacks supposedly because his wife forced him to go to a doctor’s appointment instead of a meeting at the WTC; Silverstein’s son and daughter survived because, independently of each other, they were running late; his top aide survived because he cut short a meeting he was in at the top of the North Tower; his publicist agreed to join a meeting at the WTC at 9:00 a.m. instead of 8:00 a.m.; and others associated with Silverstein Properties may have avoided danger due to the cancellation of a meeting on the 88th floor of the North Tower.

Read the rest of this entry »


America’s Broken Media And The Collapse Of World Trade Center 7

May 26, 2010

by Eric deCarbonnel   source: Market Skeptics   May 26, 2010

When reading the articles below, keep one question in mind: Do you find these allegations credible and serious enough to deserve media coverage?

This question is crucial because the mainstream media has been ignoring (and in some cases actively trying to discredit) the facts and arguments below for years now.

It is the job of a properly functioning media to investigate credible allegations about issues important to the people and determine their validity. America’s media appears to have failed so completely here that it should be considered completely broken, if not dead.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

The Examiner reports that over 1000 architects and engineers have signed petition to reinvestigate 9-11 destruction.

 Over 1000 architects and engineers have signed petition to reinvestigate 9-11 destruction

“At some level of government, at some point in time, there was an agreement not to tell the people the truth about what happened.” John Farmer, Senior Counsel to the 9-11 Commission in his book The Ground Truth.

Read the rest of this entry »


Controlled Demolition Expert, Tom Sullivan, Discusses Controlled Demolitions on 9/11.

May 20, 2010

In an attempt to retouch the sound quality of my original video from the May 8th event with Richard Gage and Erik Lawyer, I have decided to issue just Tom Sullivan’s interview for now because the sound is much better. I hope this works for you all out there with not-the-best laptop speakers.

Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

Read the rest of this entry »


Swiss MYSTERIES Magazine Covers Nanothermite-Research, did Interviews with Niels Harrit and German “Debunker”

May 5, 2010

source: 9/11 Blogger  May 5, 2010

The Swiss MYSTERIES magazine, print edition 3/2010, covers the story of nanothermite and a dispute between Harrit and german “debunker” Dr. Gunnar Ries. Ries made up a blog back in early 2010 and made a bunch of claims why the study wasn’t that good at all- and Prof. Harrit responded to his claims. Ries did suggest to do his own testing on the chips, if he get some.

MYSTERIES also asked swiss engineers who once claimed that WTC 7 was controlled demolition again on their standing.

Read the rest of this entry »


The “Sphere”; Stronger than WTC 7?

May 1, 2010

May 1, 2010

The Sphere” actually stood in the WTC plaza for 30 years before those same buildings fell on it. Artist Fritz Koenig created The Sphere as “a symbol of world peace.”

Amid the rubble of Sept. 11, 2001, The Sphere was one of the few art pieces salvaged, and was erected as a “temporary memorial” on March 11, 2002 to those who lost their lives. The location of the memorial is only blocks away from Ground Zero at Battery Park.  Being modern and abstract, it may be hard to imagine what The Sphere looked like before the attack (above video added for reference). 

Read the rest of this entry »


CIA Admits: “..Al Qaeda Never Expected the Towers to Fall. “

April 28, 2010

 Nor Cal Truth    April,  2010

Update #1  – I have tried to introduce with why I see this as an important development in the story of 9/11 due to conversations with friends of mine. Though it is really late at night now for me to try to write, here it goes:

There are only a few that know what is happening behind the smoke and mirrors. The fact that not even the members of Al Qaeda expected the towers to fall might say a lot. The towers did not fall from fire, we know that. The towers did not fall from the planes, we know that too. Building 7 is only emphasis of these facts.

The CIA has detainees that are surprised at the towers collapse on 9/11.

Infact the world was surprised that the towers fell, not just Al Qaeda,

Ultimately al Qaeda was never in full control of the operation known as 9/11.

The concept of a building the size of WTC 1 or 2  being turned to pieces by a plane’s impact could not possibly be in the mind of a hijacker: It is not possible. Did the USS Cole sink? Our defense being another issue altogether, everyone knows there were plenty of warnings to intelligence agencies – so Al Qaeda never fooled anyone, really

So there they are, sitting in jail cells illegally - the dupes and the duped, unknowingly grunts of a front organization, bewildered, just as all of the world was on 9/11/01, as to how the towers fell.

Osama bin Laden had no idea the U.S. would hit al-Qaeda as hard as it has since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, a former bin Laden associate tells WTOP in an exclusive interview.

“I’m 100 percent sure they had no clue about what was going to happen,” says Noman Benotman, who was head of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group in the summer of 2000.

Benotman’s assessment is backed up by a former Central Intelligence Agency officer, who was active in the fight against al-Qaeda. The officer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, says “several captured terrorists have said publicly that al-Qaeda never expected the towers to fall. Their goal was to frighten people and impact the U.S. economy, so they really didn’t plan for the massive response the U.S. launched.”

Read the rest of this entry »


This Week in 9/11 (March 22 – March 28)

March 28, 2010

March 28, 2010

A summary of news relating to 9/11/01 - For the week of March 22 through March 28, 2010. (Last week is here)

To many the week’s biggest news might have been the documents obtained by the ACLU, detailing many things including the words of John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, and George Tenent to the 9/11 Commission Chairmen to “not cross” a certain line of investigation. According to the specific document (or page 26 in the original PDF of documents at ACLU) :

There is, however, a line that the Commission should not cross — the line separating the Commission’s proper inquiry into the September 11, 2001 attacks from interference with the Government’s ability to safeguard the national security, including protection of Americans from future terrorist attacks. The Commission staffs proposed participation in questioning of detainees would cross that line.

Of course that is only a small piece of the withholdings by officials regarding 9/11, but many can use this in specific discussions of the whitewash known as the 9/11 Commission Report and its improper investigation to skeptics. 

 Another tape allegedly from Bin Laden made headlines across the U.S.. However none of the headlines from the mainstream “corp-press” mentioned the fact that Bin Laden has been reported dead by many media outlets:

Read the rest of this entry »


Building What?! Day 7

March 23, 2010

Fellow Advocates:

 

March 23, 2010

Thank you for keeping Building What?! going full blast.  Our numbers are high and the simplicity of our message is opening eyes.  Think about it this way: two weeks from today the entire New York City Council and all of their staff will know that 1,100+ architects and engineers are calling for a new investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.  Almost all of them will have seen footage of WTC 7, and a vast majority, those capable of being honest with themselves, will know that office fires did not bring it down.  That in itself is a remarkable accomplishment, but more importantly, we are creating the kind of awareness that leads to unforeseeable and uncontrollable developments.  

Read the rest of this entry »


Dwain Deets at Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice

November 5, 2009

Excerpts from a multimedia presentation at Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice, on the campus of University of San Diego, on October 21, 2009. The Six Pillars of Controlled Demolition: Evidence of the Controlled Demolition of Three Steel-Framed Skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, the Iconic Twin Towers, and World Trade Center Building 7. Presentation of the evidence for controlled demolition from the perspective of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). Deets is a former engineering executive at NASA.

 


Building 7 – Gone in 7

October 7, 2009

Thanks: We Are Change LA


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers