At 00:53 and at 1:03 I hear what sounds like explosive ordnances going off. Turn the sound up. The first explosion at 00:53 gets cut off by a film edit, but at 1:03 you hear the echo.
Perhaps more importantly, a photographer for the New York Post is interviewed in Spanish, the translation is provided below.
Reporter: Brother. What happened? In Spanish.
Eyewitness: Yes, I came to cover (document) brother. Then I saw the two buildings in flames when I heard a “run, run, run, run” and the explosion. I looked back and I was able to take a picture of the explosion and run, but not enough because I was only 30 meters away from the building. There were pieces of building falling next to me, but only dirt fell on top of me - I protected a firemen.
Eyewitness: After that - for the second explosion I was inside of another building… but the force of the explosion threw me like 20 meters, like 20 feet against a wall. And that is when I hit my knee.
At 2:48 in the video below the cameraman enters World Trade Center #7. The South Tower had already collapsed, yet the North still stood as he enters WTC #7.
The structural integrity of WTC #7 looks to be in fine order while reviewing the new video. There are broken lobby windows and dust from the North Tower in thw WTC # 7 lobbies, but no major damage at all. Yet at 5:20 pm on 9/1/011 this building was destroyed and vanished to the ground level in a matter of seconds:
Amazingly, Americans were told by NIST that fire had taken this building down. More amazingly, many Americans bought it.
It is my belief that if we continue to expose the obvious and blatant lies of the World Trade Center #7 destruction, we will unavoidingly be exposing the largest lie of 9/11: Who done it.
Interestingly enough, I want to add that while this footage has been acquired due to Freedom of Information Act requests, it has been cut or edited in many places. What other clips or pieces of clips will we have to fight for, and for how long will we have to wait?
by Paul Joseph Watson source: InfoWars Oct 14, 2010
Newly obtained 9/11 eyewitness footage that NIST fought tooth and nail to keep secret contains what appears to be the sound of explosions coming from the vicinity of WTC 7 after the collapse of the twin towers, offering yet more startling evidence that the building, which was not hit by a plane yet collapsed demolition style, was deliberately imploded.
The clip was released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as part of a 3 terabyte package of video and photo data in response to a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies. As we highlighted in our previous report, almost every single video studied as part of the release thus far contains damning evidence of controlled demolition on both the twin towers and WTC 7.
The latest video is from eyewitness Richard Peskin, who filmed ground zero from a high rise building that appears to be about a dozen blocks down the street from Building 7. The first portion of the footage is filmed immediately after the collapse of the second tower of the World Trade Center. At about 10 seconds into the clip, two clear explosions can be heard.
The clip then cuts to a later time and the cameraman states, “…explosion or something because there’s a lot of police activity and sirens and more smoke rising from the ground – new smoke – so there was some kind of additional explosion but I don’t know what it was….maybe it was a federal building or something like that,” as the camera pans across a shot of WTC 7.
At around 11am – around half an hour after the collapse of the north tower of the World Trade Center and an hour after the collapse of the south tower, Peskin states, “I still hear continuing explosions, I don’t know what it is,” as small explosions can be heard in the background.
New 2010 NIST Cumulus File FOIA Release #14. NYPD aerial footage of the towers on 9/11. Montage of 25 clips. 15 of the 40 clips are bad AVI files and cannot be converted. The amazing part is the fact the NYPD never released this video to the public in it’s complete raw form, what are they hiding? Bin Laden might see the tape? The fact we have not seen all the evidence proves the government is trying to prevent public knowledge concerning 9/11.
Two new 2010 release FBI FOIA videos of the man waving the white shirt on the 106th floor of the North Tower and the supposed plane collision in the South Tower that kills him with a blast from inside the North Tower.
I think the question is whether: The impact from the plane and subsequent explosion in the other tower killed the man (presumably others as well) – or a well timed explosion in the North Tower went off at the same time as the plane impact on the south tower? Any thoughts?
The International Center for 9/11 Studies has posted a new video on YouTube. The footage was filmed by a news crew from a local NYC television station, and was received from NIST under the Freedom of Information Act.
The International Center for 9/11 Studies has secured the release of hundreds of hours of video footage and tens of thousands of photographs used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for its investigation of the collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7. This material is being released to the Center under the Freedom of Information Act, in response to a lawsuit the Center filed against NIST.
The Center filed a FOIA Request with NIST on January 26, 2009, seeking production of “all of the photographs and videos collected, reviewed, cited or in any other way used by NIST during its investigation of the World Trade Center building collapses.” Following several unsuccessful attempts to get NIST to even acknowledge receipt of the Request, the Center was forced to file a lawsuit on May 28, 2009. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the Request was assigned a reference number, and NIST began periodically releasing batches of responsive records. To date, the Center has received over 300 DVDs and several external hard disk drives that contain responsive records – more than 3 terabytes of data so far – and NIST has indicated that additional records will be released in the future.
We are currently looking at the best ways to distribute these materials to interested researchers and journalists around the world. It has taken NIST more than 8 months so far to produce a partial archive of photographs and videos in their possession, but we hope to be more efficient in our efforts. Because of the huge volume of data, we are working on a wiki-style website to facilitate review and discussion of any interesting items that are discovered by researchers.
Earlier this year 9/11 blogger, along with other websites, ran the story of a Freedom of Information Act request that ended up releasing 3,160 electronic records relating to the World Trade Center collapse investigation. It was a small story as there seemed to be very little information on who requested the FOIA, nor had people sifted through the entire release yet.
Here we have footage that was documented by William Cirone on 9/11. They were uploaded as many different 10 – 30 second clips by this YouTube user. About a month ago another YouTube user wove all the footage together into a cohesive clip, which is provided for you below.
There is new footage of World Trade Center #5, #6 and #7. However as one person noted on a forum comment, there are no south side shots of Building #7 even though it appears as if the camera would have been able to, and was about to, film it. The question is, “are there more electronic files that need releasing?”
In response to FOIA request, NIST has refused to provide copies of transcripts and tapes of interviews with the first responders about Michael Hess and Barry Jennings trapped in WTC7.
Excerpt from NIST NCSTAR 1-8: proof of existence and classification of the interviews with explicit references to the two men trapped in the WTC 7:
The week of February the 22nd through the 28th regarding news relating to 9/11, summarized.
The ripple effects of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth press conference are continuing to be seen. (Last weeks news here.) The Washington Times carried an article entitled “Explosive News“, regarding the questions that AE911Truth brings to the table. The Examiner is another outlet that carried the AE911Truth press conference. Canadian and Russian have picked up on the story of over 1000 architects and engineers calling for a new investigation into 9/11 as well.
It has only been 1 week since the conference announcing the 1,000 and they’re already at 1,080 architects and engineers! (Probably more by the time I’m done writing this. ) One observant fellow noticed that in the 18 days of February before the conference 23 architects or engineers were added to the list, while in the 10 days of February after the conference 38 newly verified architects or engineers signed on for a new investigation. That is some good news!
Posted by Brian 
