New Video: 9/11 WTC 7 Southwest Corner With Fireman Radio After North Tower Demolition

April 2, 2011

Video uploaded: ICSD9/11    Text:ICSC 9/11     Links and added videos: Nor Cal Truth   April 2, 2011

New NIST FOIA NBC Restricted Cameraman footage of WTC 7 west face.

A Fox News hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement written by former Washington D.C. prosecutor Jeffrey Scott Shapiro inadvertently reveals a shocking truth; that World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein, who collected nearly $500 million dollars in insurance as a result of the collapse of Building 7, a 47-story structure that was not hit by a plane but collapsed within seven seconds on September 11, was on the phone to his insurance carrier attempting to convince them that the building should be brought down via controlled demolition.

Read the rest of this entry »


The NEW RememberBuilding7 Television Ad

March 26, 2011

source: Remember Building 7    Mar 26, 2011

Help make this NEW TV ad go viral all over the Internet on Facebook, Twitter and others by sharing the link to this page: http://rememberbuilding7.org

Building 7 in relation to the rest of the World Trade Center complex:

To learn more about Building 7, visit “7 Facts about Building 7”, which includes photos of Building 7 before, during and after its destruction.


Album Exposing World Trade Center Building 7 Collapse Tops Billboard Chart

March 22, 2011

Uploaded on Feb 1st, 2011 –  this song has nearly 2.5 million views on YouTube! 

source: AE9/11Truth   Mar 23, 2011

Atlantic Records rap star Lupe Fiasco calls the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 into question on his new album ‘Lasers,’ released March 8, 2011.

In “Words I Never Said,” the new radio single off of ‘Lasers,’ he asks “9/11, building 7: did they really pull it?” (at 0:46)

It is one of three songs selected as “singles” by Atlantic to promote the album. Lupe’s third official release—and first in which he specifically questions the government’s version of events on 9/11/01 with reference to ignored evidence — is the Grammy Award winner’s first #1 album in the United States (all genres), with over 200,000 units sold in its opening week: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1660010/lupe-fiasco-lasers-billboard.jhtml

Read the rest of this entry »


BuildingWhat? New TV Spot To Be Unveiled at Hartford Event on March 26

March 18, 2011

source: Building What    Mar 18, 2011

The BuildingWhat? campaign is thrilled to announce that two weeks from now on Saturday March 26 we will be holding an event in West Hartford, CT to unveil our new TV spot and kick off a marathon six-month effort to create widespread awareness of the collapse of Building 7. With your support and the support of thousands of others, the TV spot will air in late April and be seen by millions of viewers in the New York Metropolitan Area, setting the stage for an even larger ad campaign during the week of the 10th Anniversary of 9/11.

Investigate Building 7

Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time will run from 9:30am to 9:30pm on Saturday March 26 at the University of Hartford’s Millard Auditorium.  This historic event will feature the most articulate voices in the growing movement to bring about a new 9/11 investigation.  Experts who have studied the events of 9/11 extensively will introduce irrefutable evidence demonstrating the need for a new investigation, and they will be calling upon New York City elected officials and the media to reexamine the most important event of our time, starting with the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

Read the rest of this entry »


9/11 Debate with Richard Gage and Chris Mohr in Colorado Broadcasting Live: Listen in

March 6, 2011

Mar 6, 2011

No Lies Radio will be broadcasting the debate live (and archiving it).

http://noliesradio.org/archives/30994

Please CLICK HERE to listen to the live debate starting at 4:00 pm Pacific time, Sunday, March 6.

This is from the Colorado 9/11 Visibility:

Colorado 9/11 Visibility is pleased to announce a live debate addressing the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001

Sunday afternoon, March 6th, at the Boulder campus of the University of Colorado, Colorado 9/11 Visibility will host a debate between Richard Gage, AIA (American Institute of Architects), and Chris Mohr, Denver investigative journalist.

The question: What brought down the three World Trade Center skyscrapers?

Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. He has been an architect for over 23 years and has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed, steel-framed buildings.  His quest for the truth about 9/11 began in 2006, and he subsequently founded Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Chris Mohr, investigative journalist and advocate of the “natural collapse” theory, is a sincere seeker of the truth who has extensively researched the collapses of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings, consulted with independent physicists and engineers, and passionately argues that the buildings collapsed due to the plane impacts and fires.

In November 2010 at Denver’s Mercury Café, Mohr debated attorney Earl Staelin on the collapse of the twin towers.  This debate was unprecedented in its civility and professionalism.

In the upcoming March 6th debate with Richard Gage, the discussion will explore not only the collapse of the twin towers, but also that of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which collapsed completely at 5:21 pm on 9/11/01.  For those of you not familiar with the collapse of WTC7, this is a riveting, don’t-miss controversy.  We look forward to a dynamic, respectful, and thoroughly informative exploration of these topics.

We are pleased to announce that radio personality Tom Kiely of INN World Report will be the moderator for this debate!

This is a rare opportunity!  Please send this announcement to your contacts and invite them to join you at the debate, in particular those who would be especially interested in hearing both sides of this controversial issue.

We believe that both sides debating respectfully, yet passionately, will have a strong impact in making “what happened on 9/11″ a legitimate subject for public discourse. Therefore, due to the importance and uniqueness of this event, Colorado 9/11 Visibility has commissioned a professional video team to film the debate and produce a high-quality program suitable for television broadcast, along with a DVD for distribution.

We need your help. This is an expensive endeavor, and we cannot continue to do work on this seminal issue without funds.  We need donations, both large and small. Please go here to donate at this website, or send a check made out to Colorado 9/11 Visibility and send to Fran Shure, 1841 S. Sherman St., Denver, CO 80210.

To learn more as well as link to the archive of the warm-up radio debate, see the article at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth


Interactive 9/11 Memorial is Junk: Uses WTC# 5 Photograph as WTC# 7 and Claims Raging Fire

February 24, 2011

Brian Romanoff    Nor Cal Truth  Feb 24, 2011

In preparation for the 10th year anniversary of the 9/11 murders, the 9/11 Memorial has put up an online interactive 9/11 timeline. It hasn’t been up more than 24 hours.

I have not had much time to review it, but sure enough I noticed a major fault right away!

The timeline mentions the WTC# 7 “collapse” at 5:20pm and if you click on the images available for that time, you will see 3 pictures - one of them being the one shown below.

The 9/11 Memorial Interactive Timeline that was just put online says that this is a raging fire in WTC 7, however it looks a lot like WTC #5

 

Lets look at an undisputed picture and video of WTC# 5:

WTC# 5 After the Fires

 

Notice the vertical beams and arched windows in the pictures and video of WTC# 5? 

Those types of beams and arches are NOT present in WTC# 7 by any means:

The 9/11 Memorial Timeline obviously is a joke for anyone interested in truth. There were no massive fires at WTC#7 and the fires that were alive were not enough to bring any building down in the manner that WTC#7 came down; it was a controlled demolition!

Worse than a joke, this memorial is peddling lies as history.

For a complete timeline that spans more than just the day of 9/11, please visit the Complete 9/11 Timeline.


A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse

February 15, 2011

Please visit the source at least once so they know that you cared about this story!

by Michael Fullerton   source: Foreign Policy Journal      Feb 15, 2011

This year will mark the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 disaster. In these 10 years, not only have extremely important scientific questions about this tragedy gone unanswered, but they have even been ridiculed to the point of deranged absurdity. We owe a valid scientific explanation to the 3000 victims on that day, the steadily dying health-stricken first responders, the dead and wounded soldiers, and the untold thousands upon thousands of dead and injured Afghans and Iraqis resulting from the terrifying never-ending “war on terror”. Critics of those skeptical of the official story of 9/11 have often objected that an alternative theory has never been put forth. To that end, this article will put forth a scientific theory for one important aspect of the 9/11 event, the Building 7 collapse.

Read the rest of this entry »


9/11 & WTC7: “Perspectives with Barry Shainbaum” on 94.3 Faith FM Kitchener, Ontario.

January 23, 2011

source: 9/11 Blogger     Jan 23, 2011

Faith FM guests include: Bob McIlvaine, lost son in 9/11 attacks, New York, NY., Tony Szamboti, mechanical engineer, Blackwood, NJ., Mike Bondi, systems engineer, Stratford, ON., Laurie Manwell, Ph.D. candidate, author: In Denial of Democracy, Kitchener, ON.

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. It would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.

Barry Shainbaum
http://www.barryshainbaum.com
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org
Building What Campaign
http://www.buildingwhat.org
State Crimes Against Democracy(SCAD) Petition
http://www.petitiononline.com/WTPvSCAD/petition.html
Kitchener Truth
http://www.kitchenertruth.blogspot.com


A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words

January 23, 2011

by Michael Cook    source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth     Jan 23, 2011

Modern Steel High-Rises Don’t Collapse Like a House of Cards
Despite Catastrophic Damage

Those of us attempting to present the evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center skyscrapers to the “uninitiated” can meet with significant psychological resistance. Some respond to the scientific forensic evidence quite readily. But some do not.

WTC 3 severely damaged from the South Tower debris. No complete collapse. The North Tower is yet to come down on top of it.

Another way to open the minds of skeptics – without getting technical at all – is to compare the other WTC buildings that did not actually collapse to the three that collapsed completely. Show the following photos to your stubborn interlocutor. Ask him or her to notice how severely damaged these other buildings were by the debris from the Twin Towers, yet substantial portions remained upright. And ask “Why?”.

World Trade Center Building Three was also known as the World Trade Center Hotel, the New York Marriott Hotel, or the Vista Hotel.

WTC 3 after the North Tower's debris rained down on it. Still some portions remain intact.

Many have compared the severe damage that WTC 3 sustained to the minimal damage that WTC 7 sustained, and wondered how WTC 7 could have collapsed so completely – like a house of cards – uniformly, symmetrically, and at free-fall acceleration as fast as a bowling ball falling off the top of it.

Read the rest of this entry »


Pressure Wave from Demolition Blasts Visible on WTC #7

January 20, 2011

Nor Cal Truth      Jan 20, 2011

Blast waves are visible on WTC #7. Many windows are ejected from the building or dislodged, while the penthouse on top “collapses.” NIST wants you to think this building came down from anything but controlled demolitions, they would love it you believe that fire brought it down! If you don’t think this looks like a fire, but more like a controlled demolition you should visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and sign their petition.


New TV Ads On the Way! + An Important Action Alert

January 18, 2011

source: Building What   Jan 18, 2011

“The day we see the truth and cease to speak is the day we begin to die.”
 
 -Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Dear Friends,

We would like to extend our deepest thanks to Mark Stepnoski for generously offering $10,000 to match all donations made to the BuildingWhat? campaign during the last three days of 2010.  Supporters across the country and around the world rose to the occasion, giving nearly $30,000 on top of Mark’s $10,000 to bring the campaign to $67,000.  Thank you all for your generous support and your belief in our strategy.

In the next few weeks we will be releasing a series of brand new TV ads.  Without giving anything away, we are confident in saying these new ads will generate much publicity and create a groundswell of public demand for a new Building 7 investigation leading up to the 10th Anniversary.

ACTION ITEM

To help pave the way towards that day, we have an important action item that will take you only two minutes to complete.  Please help us send 500 emails to the Speaker of the New York City Council to inform her that 2010 was only the beginning of our campaign, and our calls for the empanelment an independent commission to investigate Building 7 will grow as the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 approaches.

Read the rest of this entry »


WTC #7 Demolition: Why the Building Really Fell

January 14, 2011

This is a great complitlation of video and information regarding WTC #7.

source: ICSD911     Jan 14, 2011


Joint Statement on the Pentagon: David Chandler and Jon Cole

January 2, 2011

David Chandler is a physics teacher, and has made invaluable videos and contributions to the 9/11 movement, including being a large part in forcing NIST to admit free-fall acceleration in the collapse of WTC #7.  Jon Cole has made many “9/11 Experiments” videos including, “The Great Thermite Debate“.

Please read this post by the two of them and follow their links given for further research.

source: 9/11 Speak Out     Jan 2, 2011

Overwhelming Evidence of Insider Complicity on 9/11

If you watch our videos and read the links on our site (http://www.911speakout.org) you will understand why we assert that the weight of the evidence points to the fact that 9/11 was orchestrated by insiders…

* with access to high-tech military-grade nano-energetic materials (aka nano-thermite)
* with access to the infrastructure of some of the most highly secure buildings in New York over an extended period of time
* with the expertise to accomplish the most difficult demolitions in history
* with the ability to manage public perception of the event despite numerous contrary contemporaneous eyewitness reports
* with the ability to coordinate the take-downs of the twin towers with the airplane flights
* with the ability to coordinate with the military to not intercept the airplane flights
* with the ability to stage a highly coordinated cover-up, starting on the day of 9/11 itself
* with the ability to prevent ANY investigation for many months
* with the ability to stage-manage fraudulent investigations once the demand grew too loud (the 9/11 Commission report the NIST reports)

All of this evidence comes from the investigation of the World Trade Center, based on public evidence and the laws of physics. The evidence is overwhelming, consistent, persuasive, and broadly agreed upon by the “scientific wing” of the 9/11 Truth Movement. The concrete physical and video evidence leading to these conclusions narrows the field of possible perpetrators significantly.

The Pentagon

There are also anomalies in the events at the Pentagon. The biggest anomalies, in our opinion , have gotten some of the least attention.

* How could the Pentagon, the hub of the US military, have been so poorly defended that it could be hit in the first place, after the buildings in New York City had already been hit and other hijacked planes were known to still be in the air?
* Why was Norman Minetta’s testimony about Cheney’s response to the approach of the aircraft discounted in the 9/11 Commission report?

Read the rest of this entry »


WTC 7 Demolition – Penthouse Collapse Zoom With PIP Long (CNN Raw No Audio)

December 31, 2010

Nor Cal Truth  Dec 31, 2010

More video from ICSD911‘s YouTube channel.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers