For many of you this may be old news, however this is a new compilation by ICSD 9/11. 7 minutes of eyewitness firefighter testimony to explosion, explosions and more explosions on 9/11.
source: ICSD 9/11 Jan 8, 2011
Collected 9/11 Firefighter Witness Testimonies presented by David R. Griffin and Kevin Ryan
January 8, 2011
Leave a Comment » | 
9/11 | Tagged: 9/11, explosions, Firefighters, oral testimonies | 
Permalink
Posted by Brian
Lies, Lawsuits, and Legislation: A Brief History of the 9/11 First Responders Hellish Rollercoaster Ride
January 4, 2011This started as a much smaller opinion piece on “H.R.847 – James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010.” Obviously it turned into something else, a brief history maybe, but as always there is so much more…
Nor Cal Truth Jan 4, 2011
“This is a time for reflection, not retribution.” – Barack Obama, 2009
Obama is no hero. Only after so many wrongs could the recently passed 9/11 Health legislation seem right.
The Twin Towers on 9/11, had they not been destroyed by demolitions, would have been a hard days work for the NYPD and NYFD; yet the fires would have been put out. In fact in many parts of the buildings the fires were put out, or going out. It is quite possible that the NYFD would have lost a few good men through the day fighting the fires inside the WTC on 9/11 had they had the chance to do so, maybe 10 to 15 firefighters even. But surely not hundreds, especially not a thousand.
343 of NY’s first responders were killed in the World Trade Center demolitions of 9/11/01. They were murdered along with thousands of civilians and no one responsible has gone to jail for those crimes.
The WTC demolition created a cloud of debris-turned-to-dust that covered the city of Manhattan streets, homes, schools and lungs of tens of thousands of people. This could not have happened without explosives and demolitions; volcanoes aside.
The month following 9/11 was so filled with mistakes, possible criminal intent, disinformation, and irresponsibility from the EPA and CEQ that I will just have to list some highlights below:
- September 11, 2001: Ground Zero Dust Sample Contains 4.5 Percent Asbestos – A dust sample is taken by EPA employees as they flee the collapsing buildings. The samples are later tested and found to contain an asbestos level of 4.5 percent.
- September 13, 2001: EPA Administrator Tells New York Residents near Ground Zero to ‘Wipe All Surfaces with a Damp Cloth’ - The recommendation is made despite two studies completed for the EPA in 1993 demonstrating that HEPA vacuums do not effectively remove asbestos from carpets and upholstery (see 1993) and that vacuuming actually increases asbestos levels in the air during use (see 1993).
- September 14, 2001: EPA Spokesman Says Business Can Resume Near Wall Street on Monday - “There’s nothing at this point that indicates that business can’t resume..”
3 Comments | 9/11, First Responders of Ground Zero, health, original articles | Tagged: 9/11, christine todd whitman, epa, first responders, health, lawsuits, NSA, White House | Permalink
Posted by Brian
The Psychological Implications of 9/11 by Laurie Manwell
January 3, 2011source: 9/11 Blogger 1/3/11
The Psychological Implications of 9/11 Presented by Laurie Manwell
Peace Through Truth
Part 1 of 6
Part 2 of 6
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, psychological warfare | Tagged: 9/11, kevin ryan, laurie manwell, psychology | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Obama Signs 9/11 Health Bill
January 3, 2011source: CBC Jan 3, 2011
US President Barack Obama signed a benefits bill on Sunday that will help police, firefighters and other emergency workers who became ill after working in the area around the World Trade Center towers that collapsed on 9/11.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, First Responders of Ground Zero, health, Obama | Tagged: 9/11, first responders, health, Obama, zadroga | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Joint Statement on the Pentagon: David Chandler and Jon Cole
January 2, 2011David Chandler is a physics teacher, and has made invaluable videos and contributions to the 9/11 movement, including being a large part in forcing NIST to admit free-fall acceleration in the collapse of WTC #7. Jon Cole has made many “9/11 Experiments” videos including, “The Great Thermite Debate“.
Please read this post by the two of them and follow their links given for further research.
source: 9/11 Speak Out Jan 2, 2011
Overwhelming Evidence of Insider Complicity on 9/11
If you watch our videos and read the links on our site (http://www.911speakout.org) you will understand why we assert that the weight of the evidence points to the fact that 9/11 was orchestrated by insiders…
* with access to high-tech military-grade nano-energetic materials (aka nano-thermite)
* with access to the infrastructure of some of the most highly secure buildings in New York over an extended period of time
* with the expertise to accomplish the most difficult demolitions in history
* with the ability to manage public perception of the event despite numerous contrary contemporaneous eyewitness reports
* with the ability to coordinate the take-downs of the twin towers with the airplane flights
* with the ability to coordinate with the military to not intercept the airplane flights
* with the ability to stage a highly coordinated cover-up, starting on the day of 9/11 itself
* with the ability to prevent ANY investigation for many months
* with the ability to stage-manage fraudulent investigations once the demand grew too loud (the 9/11 Commission report the NIST reports)
All of this evidence comes from the investigation of the World Trade Center, based on public evidence and the laws of physics. The evidence is overwhelming, consistent, persuasive, and broadly agreed upon by the “scientific wing” of the 9/11 Truth Movement. The concrete physical and video evidence leading to these conclusions narrows the field of possible perpetrators significantly.
The Pentagon
There are also anomalies in the events at the Pentagon. The biggest anomalies, in our opinion , have gotten some of the least attention.
* How could the Pentagon, the hub of the US military, have been so poorly defended that it could be hit in the first place, after the buildings in New York City had already been hit and other hijacked planes were known to still be in the air?
* Why was Norman Minetta’s testimony about Cheney’s response to the approach of the aircraft discounted in the 9/11 Commission report?
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7, NIST, Pentagon, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, david chandler, evidence, jon cole, Pentagon, plane | Permalink
Posted by Brian
