Nor Cal Truth Dec 31, 2010
More video from ICSD911‘s YouTube channel.
WTC 7 Demolition – Penthouse Collapse Zoom With PIP Long (CNN Raw No Audio)
December 31, 2010
Leave a Comment » | 
9/11, building 7, Film/Video | Tagged: building 7, long view, WTC 7 | 
Permalink
Posted by Brian
NYC Department of Buildings: No Copies of City Issued Permits for Construction Within WTC 7 Found For Years 1999, 2000 and 2001
December 31, 2010More great FOIA work by Aidan Monaghan source: 9/11 Blogger Dec 31, 2010
A Freedom of Information reply from the New York City Department of Buildings reports that copies of city permits for routine or major construction work within World Trade Center building 7 during the years 1999, 2000 and 2001 could not be located. Records for the “ALT 2” category were requested.
“DOB divides construction work into two main categories: New Buildings (NB) and Alterations (ALT). Alterations are further divided into three types—ALT1s, ALT2s and ALT3s—depending upon the scope of work. An ALT1 is a major alteration in which the use or occupancy of an existing property changes. An ALT2 is an alteration in which the use or occupancy of a facility does not change, but includes multiple work types, i.e., plumbing and construction. ALT1s and ALT2s must be filed by a registered architect or licensed engineer.”
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, Freeedom of Information Acts (FOIA) | Tagged: aidan monaghan, FOIA, infrastructure, work records, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
9 Months Before 9/11, Online Discussion About Whether WTC Could Survive Plane Impact
December 30, 2010Nor Cal Truth Dec 30, 2010
I found the following on “Geekosystem” and thought it was interesting:
Reddit alerts us to the existence of an unsettling thread on aviation site airliners.net dated November 30, 2000, in which forumers debated whether or not the World Trade Center “could survive an 767-300 impact.”
Several commenters chastised the original poster for asking such a morbid question, but there are some eerily prescient responses in the thread: While the general (though not unanimous) consensus was that the WTC would stay standing, but with heavy damage, and most (though not all) repliers took the question as referring to an accidental crash rather than a terrorist attack, they predicted the danger to people on the ground as well as in the buildings and in the plane.
The question asked was this:
1 Comment | 9/11 | Tagged: 2000, 9/11, airliners.net, forum, november, planes, towers | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Building What?: NFL’s Mark Stepnoski & Mechanical Engineer Tony Szamboti on Alex Jones
December 29, 2010
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, building 7, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, alex jones, Building what?!, Mark Stepnoski, Tony Szamboti | Permalink
Posted by Brian
NFL Great to Match Your BuildingWhat? Donations Through December 31
December 29, 2010
source: Building What Dec 29, 2010
The BuildingWhat? campaign is pleased to announce beginning today, December 29, through December 31, NFL great Mark Stepnoski will match, up to $10,000, all donations made to the next TV ad campaign.
Thanks to the generosity of supporters across the globe, the BuildingWhat? campaign has raised almost $30,000 since the launch of the new fundraising drive on December 5. We are thrilled and grateful that two-time Superbowl champion Mark Stepnoski has so generously stepped forward to spur us toward the $50,000-milestone. Between now and the end of the year, Mark will match every dollar you donate; and just a reminder, every dollar you do give in 2010 will be fully tax-deductible when you file your taxes in the coming months!
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, 9/11 Victims Families, building 7 | Tagged: 9/11, Building what?!, donations, Mark Stepnoski, NFL, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
John Pilger – The War You Don’t See
December 28, 2010“The attacks of September the 11th were appropriated by a clique within the United States establishment in order to further its aims around the world.” – John Pilger (see here at 2:10)
source: Information Clearing House Dec 28, 2010
A powerful and timely investigation into the media’s role in war, tracing the history of ‘embedded’ and independent reporting from the carnage of World War One to the destruction of Hiroshima, and from the invasion of Vietnam to the current war in Afghanistan and disaster in Iraq. As weapons and propaganda become even more sophisticated, the nature of war is developing into an ‘electronic battlefield’ in which journalists play a key role, and civilians are the victims. But who is the real enemy?
John Pilger says in the film: “We journalists… have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else’s country… That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home… In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us… Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power.”
Part 1/7
Part 2/7
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, MSM, War of Terror | Tagged: 9/11, John Pilger, war on terror, War you Dont See | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11
December 27, 2010Be sure to watch all of David Chandlers‘ and Jonathon Coles‘ videos at their new website: 9/11 Speakout!
by David Chandler source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Dec 27, 2010
Galileo was the first to describe the amazing fact that, apart from air resistance, all objects fall at the same “rate.” If you have not experienced this fact directly, try dropping a large rock and a pebble side-by- side. The rate we are referring to is not a “speed,” because for a falling object the speed is constantly changing. The rate we are talking about is actually the “rate of increase of speed,” how quickly the speed builds up, called acceleration. The acceleration achieved by all falling bodies, apart from air resistance, is called the “acceleration of gravity.”
Gravity causes freely falling objects to increase their speed by about 32 ft/s per second. (The awkward unit, feet per second per second is commonly abbreviated ft/s2.) When an object is dropped, the speed is initially zero, but it immediately starts speeding up. After 1 second its speed will be 32 ft/s. After 2 seconds its speed will be 64 ft/s. Etc. 32 ft/s2 is an approximation. The “acceleration of gravity” actually varies slightly from place to place. In New York City it is 32.159 ft/s2.
3 Comments | 9/11, building 7 | Tagged: 9/11, david chandler, WTC 7 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
45 Experts from AE911Truth – Powerful New DVD in the Works
December 26, 2010by Mike Bondi source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Dec 26, 2010
Here at AE911Truth, we are excited to be producing a new DVD that will present hard-hitting analysis and testimony from more than 45 experts in several fields of study directly related to the destruction of the three WTC skyscrapers on 9/11. The upcoming documentary entitled “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out” will contain cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and others. Richard Gage, AIA, will briefly introduce the evidence sections and the experts will provide the details from their individual areas of expertise. All are degreed. Many are licensed. Several have Ph.D’s – including eminent scientist Lynn Margulis, who exposes the fraud of NIST and explains how the scientific method should have been applied.
We also interviewed a half-dozen psychologists who will help us to understand why 9/11 Truth is so difficult for the public to even touch, much less grasp – and what we as activists can do better to reach them. And we will hear from several family members of the 9/11 victims who support AE911Truth in our call for a new investigation.
One of the experts featured in this documentary is Robert McCoy, high-rise architect, who has been licensed in California since 1964 and has worked on the design of many large steel-framed high-rise buildings. He has even corresponded directly with the builders of the WTC complex during its construction. Like many experts, McCoy’s suspicions about the events of 9/11 started almost immediately following the events of that day.
High-Rise Architect Robert McCoy
McCoy questioned many aspects of the mechanics involved in the “collapse” of the Twin Towers and Building 7. He discusses in detail the robustness of the buildings’ design, and how sagging of the upper floors would not be sufficient to initiate collapse and bring the buildings down. He also explains the discrepancies between what we might expect to see in a fire-induced gravitational collapse (though more than one hundred fires have never caused the collapse of a skyscraper) and what actually occurred. McCoy explains that in a pancake collapse scenario, “…it’s going to come down in a staccato kind of way … it’s not going to come as a smooth fall … I saw billowing clouds of dust…”
Robert McCoy
McCoy talks about another critical aspect of the Twin Towers’ design, the massive core columns: “Those columns were probably four times as strong as they needed to be … Now you have this building coming down, and [it was as if] the columns below were simply not there … The buildings accelerated as they were coming down – not getting resistance from these massive columns in the center of the core of [these buildings].”
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 9/11, architects and engineers for 9/11 truth, DVD, professionals | Permalink
Posted by Brian
More (and Less) Video From the FOIA
December 25, 2010From YouTube User ICSD911 Dec 25, 2010
New NIST FOIA Cumulus release #14 Abe Conby 2 Clips DSCF0592 and DSCF0598. Clips DSCF0593-DSCF0597 missing from FOIA file. This would be the best shot yet, where are the missing WTC7 shots that should occur between clips 93 to 97? Notice the heavy dust coating everything, lack of a giant pile of collapsed building, the siding is all blasted off not crushed, and the cars are overturned but uncrushed from above. There is still a giant coverup of 9/11, why would they do that if it happened as they told us?
1 Comment | 9/11, Film/Video, Freeedom of Information Acts (FOIA) | Tagged: 9/11, FOIA, NIST, video | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Flight Data Shows AA77 Cockpit Door Never Opened
December 24, 2010For more about this, please visit the Pilots for 9/11 Truth forum, also – 9/11 Blogger always has tons of informative comments, but this is a pilot’s issue.
source: Pilots for 9/11 Truth Dec 24, 2010
Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled “FLT DECK DOOR”, cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.
1 Comment | 9/11, Flight 77, Pentagon | Tagged: 9/11, cockpit door, Flight 77 | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Mickey Huff and Peter Phillips on KPFA Today at 8:00
December 23, 2010Both Mickey Huff and Peter Phillips have done a wonderful job bringing under-reported news to the forefront; including 9/11. Having them on KPFA, though during turbulent times at KPFA, is exciting news for me and many others.
Dec 23, 2010
Mickey Huff and I will address Truth Emergency, Interview Economist Michael Hudson and present validated news stories from Project Censored Affiliates. 8-00 AM to 9:00 AM Pacific standard Time and Archived thereafter.
You can listen on-line at www.kpfa.org or if within reach of KPFA’s area (50,000 watts) SF Bay Area live on the radio at 94.1 FM
1 Comment | peter phillips, Project Censored | Tagged: KPFA, mickey huff, peter phillips, Project Censored | Permalink
Posted by Brian
More Witness Accounts of Explosions
December 22, 2010Nor Cal Truth Dec 22, 2010
If the towers had collapsed, we would have heard firemen saying, “the building collapsed”. Instead we heard words like; explosion, blew, erupted. It is not like all the eyewitness’ were using the wrong adjectives on 9/11/01. Thanks to ICSD911
“..they just blew, the tower blew…” – Fireman
“…a huge explosion now raining debris on all of us. We better get out-of-the-way……” – ABC News Reporter
“..then, suddenly the second tower erupted right before our eyes…” – ABC News Narrator
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, demolitions, Film/Video, Freeedom of Information Acts (FOIA) | Tagged: 9/11, blew, explosions, FOIA, reporters, towers | Permalink
Posted by Brian
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Looking Back at an Amazing 2010
December 22, 2010by Eli Rika source: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Dec 22, 2010
The past year has brought many successes for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and its supporters. In 2010, we saw the number of petition signers reach new milestones, we welcomed the support of more influential public figures, and we shined light on WTC Building 7 through the airwaves and in the skies above New York City. Take a journey back in time with us and revisit the defining moments that you helped make possible:
January
10 Architect Richard Gage, AIA, debates explosives expert Ron Craig on The Conspiracy Show
19 Japanese edition of Blueprint for Truth DVD debuts
February
19 AE911Truth holds its milestone Press Conference in San Francisco to announce 1,000 architectural and engineering petition signers
Dr. Steven Jones describes explosive evidence at the historic AE911Truth San Francisco press conference while Dr. Griffin and Erik Lawyer of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth wait in the wings.
March
6 AE911Truth headlines the “Treason in America” conference in Philadelphia
30 AE911Truth TV spots featuring actor Ed Asner begin airing in New York City
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, Professionals for 9/11 truth | Tagged: 2010, 9/11, architects and engineers for 9/11 truth, Richard Gage | Permalink
Posted by Brian
The Fearfully Changing World of Schools After 9/11
December 21, 2010Nor Cal Truth Dec 21, 2010
Recently an architect called for keeping terrorism and fear in mind when planning an urban development. The media everyday reminds us of “terrorists” and that we should be alert, vigilant and willing to be groped for our safety. How many times are the FBI really just setting up young, desperate, dark-skinned men as opposed to actually stopping a “terror plot”?
Well, here are some excerpts from an article I found recently detailing a few changes in the school’s safety apparatus since 9/11. The article comes from Walden University. Lets take a look:
According to SchoolSecurity.org, several schools were unprepared for terrorist threats on U.S. soil before 9/11….
Many school emergency plans around the country were useless to the children because they did not address terrorism specifically.
Since 9/11, safety drills in schools have become more frequent….
New safety programs seek to identifying different types of emergencies, such as domestic terrorism, nuclear accidents, hostage situations, bomb threats and student violence. Schools nationwide have implemented stronger police-school-community partnerships and more cost-effective security measures during national security terror level alerts.
Some parents may feel intimidated or apprehensive when they see additional law enforcement or metal detectors placed in schools. Schools are protecting children from the worst case scenarios, such as terrorist or bomb threats, sniper attacks and bomb detonations. They are also protecting the school against other students that could harm or pose a threat to students and faculty. Since 9/ 11, not only terrorist attacks have become a possibility, so has student violence and the increased threat for biological terrorism.
Since 9/11 more preventative measures have been established. Cameras that track the footage of most areas of the school premises are common. School lock-down procedures during which no child or adult is allowed to enter or exit the building establishes better safety procedures. Diligence and an increased awareness….have been some of the most beneficial changes in promoting safety awareness in schools since 9/11.
Leave a Comment » | 9/11, education, Fear | Tagged: 9/11, Fear, schools, Walden | Permalink
Posted by Brian
