Opting Out of “Smart”Meter is not an Option: PG&E, CPUC Plan to Roll Over Citizen, City Demands

November 30, 2010

Nor Cal Truth     Nov 30, 2010

The following video documents the latest efforts by California citizenry in blocking and slowing the “Smart”Meter installations:

As reported by others for a long time, PG&E is not accepting “opt outs”. The proper term is “deferment” or “delaying” as opt out is not an option in the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) mandates that PG&E is following blindly.

Reported a year ago in the San Jose Mercury News and carried by others including TURN:

Some consumers have been stunned to learn that SmartMeters are mandatory: There’s no way to opt out of getting one. The meters, as well as the wires and pipes that lead up to them, are PG&E property, and the utility says it has the regulatory authority to install and maintain them.

PG&E will eventually show up to customers doors with law enforcement to make sure that the “Smart”Meters are installed. This could become tricky, especially in WatsonvilleSanta Cruz County or Fairfax, Ca where city ordinances have been passed banning PG&E from installing the new technology.

Watsonville has stepped up to the plate by issuing a ticket to PG&E with a fine of $100.00.

A Watsonville building official smacked PG&E with a $100 fine this week for installing a SmartMeter – likely the first citation the utility has received since several California cities began banning the controversial technology.

Read the rest of this entry »


Continuity of Government: Is the State of Emergency Superseding our Constitution?

November 30, 2010

source: Global Research      Nov 30, 2010

Is the State of Emergency Superseding our Constitution? Address to the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, November 23, 2010  

In July 1987, during the Iran-Contra Hearings grilling of Oliver North, the American public got a glimpse of “highly sensitive” emergency planning North had been involved in. Ostensibly North had been handling plans for an emergency response to a nuclear attack (a legitimate concern). But press accounts alleged that the planning was for a more generalized suspension of the constitution at the president’s determination.

 As part of its routine Iran-contra coverage, the following exchange was printed in the New York Times, but without journalistic comment or follow-up:

 [Congressman Jack] Brooks: Colonel North, in your work at the N.S.C. were you not assigned, at one time, to work on plans for the continuity of government in the event of a major disaster? 

Both North’s attorney and Sen. Daniel Inouye, the Democratic Chair of the Committee, responded in a way that showed they were aware of the issue: 

Brendan Sullivan [North's counsel, agitatedly]: Mr. Chairman?

[Senator Daniel] Inouye: I believe that question touches upon a highly sensitive and classified area so may I request that you not touch upon that?

Brooks: I was particularly concerned, Mr. Chairman, because I read in Miami papers, and several others, that there had been a plan developed, by that same agency, a contingency plan in the event of emergency, that would suspend the American constitution. And I was deeply concerned about it and wondered if that was an area in which he had worked. I believe that it was and I wanted to get his confirmation.

Inouye: May I most respectfully request that that matter not be touched upon at this stage. If we wish to get into this, I’m certain arrangements can be made for an executive session.[1]

Brooks was responding to a story by Alfonzo Chardy in the Miami Herald. about Oliver North’s involvement with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in planning for “Continuity of Government” (COG). According to Chardy, the plans envisaged “suspension of the Constitution, turning control of the government over to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, emergency appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law during a national crisis.”[2]

  Read the rest of this entry »


Why Were Dump Trucks Ready on 9/11/01 Cart Off Evidence

November 28, 2010

by Brian Romanoff   Nor Cal Truth   Nov 28, 2010

The removal of debris from the crime scene of 9/11 has been looked at as a piece to the other crime of 9/11; the cover-up and censorship of the event and the evidence. Professionals would like to know: if the official story were correct, why would fire collapse WTC #7? This would be the first time in history that office fires could account for a total failure and global collapse of a steel-framed high-rise building. Surely there would be something to learn – imagine if you dropped a ball and it fell up!

If the removal of 9/11 crime scene evidence is new information to you, let me point you to another question you should be asking: If the attacks of 9/11 were a surprise and the collapse of WTC #7 unprecedented in history, why was an army of dump trucks there the same day ready to cart off debris which included human remains and structural evidence? 

Trucks entering frame at 1:26 below, seconds after WTC #7 collapsed:

“Where’s all the rubble?”

Read the rest of this entry »


US General McChrystal Approved Fake Taliban Leader for Peace Talks

November 27, 2010

related: British Special Forces dressed as insurgents caught attacking NATO troops. (Here and  here)

Fake leaders for peace talks are the not-so-distant cousin of  faked terror events for war profits.

source: Guardian UK     Nov 27, 2010

Peace talks conducted with an impostor who posed as a Taliban leader, and which led to a meeting with Hamid Karzai in Kabul and thousands of dollars in “goodwill payments”, were started by the Afghan government and approved by the former American commander, Stanley McChrystal, the Guardian has learned.

This account sharply contradicts claims made by the Afghan presidency, which has put the entire blame on Britain, apparently supported privately by US officials.

In fact, the overriding desire to find a negotiated end to the conflict, particularly on the part of David Cameron, appears to have generated credulity on all sides, and led to an embarrassing debacle that has lessened trust and set back hopes of meaningful negotiations in the near future.

Read the rest of this entry »


U.S. Now in Afghanistan for 9 Years and 50 Days (As Long As Soviet Union)

November 27, 2010

Nor Cal Truth      Nov 27, 2010

A reminder from the AP:

The Soviet Union couldn’t win in Afghanistan, and now the United States is about to have something in common with that futile campaign: nine years, 50 days.

On Friday, the U.S.-led coalition will have been fighting in this South Asian country for as long as the Soviets did in their humbling attempt to build up a socialist state.

When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on Dec. 27, 1979, its stated goal was to transform Afghanistan into a modern socialist state. The Soviets sought to prop up a communist regime that was facing a popular uprising, but left largely defeated on Feb. 15, 1989.

Not only that, our top U.S. officials want to be in there until at least 2014:

Read the rest of this entry »


Dear Keith Olbermann: Let 9/11 Truth Have it’s Deserved Airtime

November 25, 2010

Nor Cal Truth   Nov 25, 2010

Keith Olbermann had to take a shot at people who question the official 9/11 account, even if just a little bit.

Olbermann has called for Roger Ailes to fire Judge Andrew Napolitano for his 9/11 “truth” related comments made during a radio interview. All of that follows the Geraldo episode featuring mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti and 9/11 family member Bob McIlvaine discussing the curious nature of  the WTC #7 collaspe.

Below is the Alex Jones show that features Andrew Napolitano (begins at 3:50):

Read the rest of this entry »


Rep. Kucinich Slams Fake Afghan Elections, Fake Withdrawal, Fake Taliban

November 25, 2010

source: Raw Story      Nov 25, 2010 

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) again called for the United States to end its involvement in Afghanistan after it was revealed that NATO officials were duped into holding negotiations with a man posing as a senior member of the Taliban.

“The war in Afghanistan is taking place in a netherworld where facts and common sense have no place,” Kucinich said Tuesday. “Elections are fake. Our deadline to withdraw is a fake. Now, we learn that a fake Taliban leader has been leading us to believe that NATO was facilitating high-level talks between Taliban leadership and the corrupt Afghan central government we’re propping up.”

“The only real thing about this war is the dead and wounded soldiers and civilians, the wasted tax dollars and the mounting evidence telling us to get out,” he added.

A man posing as Mullah Akthar Mohammad Mansour, a senior leader of the Taliban, was flown on British military aircraft to Kabul to meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and NATO officials, according to the Washington Post.

“It’s not him,” a diplomat told the New York Times. “And we gave him a lot of money.”

Read the rest of this entry »


Sonoma County Bomb Squad meets Nor Cal Truth

November 23, 2010

Nor Cal Truth     Nov 23, 2010

“Keep up the good work” comment by SWAT officer made it all worth it.

I happened to stumble upon a SWAT and Bomb Squad training in Santa Rosa, Ca on Nov. 6th. I set up a small make-shift “truth-booth” with camera and tried to politely hand out information. After 3 hours, about 6 packets were taken by officials …  better than none.
Read the rest of this entry »


Gary Franchi Interviews Bob McIlvaine About Geraldo’s Change Of Heart With 9/11 Truth

November 23, 2010

Nov 23, 2010

Below is the appearance by 9/11 victim family member Bob McIlvaine on FOX with Geraldo:

This is Judge Napolitano’s follow up with Geraldo:


Evidence for Informed Trading on the Attacks of September 11

November 21, 2010

by Kevin Ryan    source: Foreign Policy Journal Nov 21, 2010

Just after September 11th 2001, many governments began investigations into possible insider trading related to the terrorist attacks of that day.  Such investigations were initiated by the governments of Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Monte Carlo, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United States, and others.  Although the investigators were clearly concerned about insider trading, and considerable evidence did exist, none of the investigations resulted in a single indictment.  That’s because the people identified as having been involved in the suspicious trades were seen as unlikely to have been associated with those alleged to have committed the 9/11 crimes.

This is an example of the circular logic often used by those who created the official explanations for 9/11.  The reasoning goes like this: if we assume that we know who the perpetrators were (i.e. the popular version of “al Qaeda”) and those who were involved in the trades did not appear to be connected to those assumed perpetrators, then insider trading did not occur.

That’s basically what the 9/11 Commission told us.  The Commission concluded that “exhaustive investigations” by the SEC and the FBI “uncovered no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities transactions.”  What they meant was that someone did profit through securities transactions but, based on the Commission’s assumptions of guilt, those who profited were not associated with those who were guilty of conducting the attacks.  In a footnote, the Commission report acknowledged “highly suspicious trading on its face,” but said that this trading on United Airlines was traced back to “A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda.”[1]

Read the rest of this entry »


Sept. 11 Workers Agree to Settle Health Lawsuits

November 21, 2010

related: 9/11 First Responder Death toll Nears 1,000

related:  Dust to Dust; The Health Effects of 9/11

source: NY Times Nov 21, 2010

After a wrenching seven-year battle, more than 10,000 workers who sued New York City over health damages they claimed after the 9/11 recovery efforts have approved a settlement, clearing the way for payouts totaling at least $625 million, lawyers said Friday.

Their responses, delivered to a federal judge in Manhattan, ended months of wrangling over whether the city and its contractors were shortchanging the workers for the respiratory and other illnesses they developed after toiling in the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center.

Read the rest of this entry »


Two 9/11 First Responders Die of Cancer Within one Week of Court Settlement

November 21, 2010

related:  NYC, 9/11 first responders finalize settlement

related:  9/11 First Responder Death toll Nears 1,000

related:  Dust to Dust; The Health Effects of 9/11

Nor Cal Truth  Nov 21, 2010

This article from NY Daily News details the passing of another NYPD officer due to  9/11 related health effects:

The sacrifice of a cancer-stricken city cop laid to rest Tuesday was held aloft by union leaders in the push to aid ill Ground Zero responders.

“He died from a rare cancer that literally ate his face,” Lynch said, flanked by other officers. “The young man that joined this police department withered away and died because he was willing to put his life on the line and respond on Sept. 11 – and not leave until our job was done.”

Lynch was supposed to be in Washington with other members of the New York delegation to press for passage of a bill that would help the families of injured Ground Zero heroes like Mahmoud.

Mahmoud died after contracting a rare cancer of the nasal passages that required disfiguring surgery to remove his nose.

“It is very difficult for us,” his brother, Hashem, said. “But David isn’t the only one. There are others like him and they should be looked up to.”

The following article from Newsday is from just after the court settlement:

Robert Ehmer of East Meadow had planned to use his share of the settlement for Ground Zero rescue and recovery workers to pay for treatment that his Medicare insurance wouldn’t cover, his sister Annette Ehmer said.

Ehmer, a 20-year New York City police officer, lost a three-year battle with kidney cancer Sunday, dying at the Hospice Inn in Melville. He was 47.


FOX Continues the WTC #7 Discussion with Geraldo and Judge Napolitano

November 21, 2010

(If you have not seen these videosto watch them in chronological order start with the video on bottom!)

Nov 20,  2010

And this is from last week:

Read the rest of this entry »


Jesse Ventura Tackles the JFK Assasination

November 21, 2010

Nov 21, 2010

Part 1 of 3

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers